mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Project and Probe: Sample-Efficient Domain Adaptation by Interpolating Orthogonal Features

arXiv 2302.05441 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transfer learning with a small amount of target data is an effective and common approach to adapting a pre-trained model to distribution shifts. In some situations, target data labels may be expensive to obtain, so we may only have access to a limited number of target data points. To make the most of a very small target dataset, we propose a lightweight, sample-efficient approach that learns a diverse set of features and adapts to a target distribution by interpolating these features. Our approach, Project and Probe (Pro2), first learns a linear projection that maps a pre-trained embedding onto orthogonal directions while being predictive of labels in the source dataset. The goal of this step is to learn a variety of predictive features, so that at least some of them remain useful after distribution shift. Pro2 then learns a linear classifier on top of these projected features using a small target dataset. Theoretically, we find that Pro2 results in more sample-efficient generalization by inducing a favorable bias-variance tradeoff. Our experiments on four datasets, with multiple distribution shift settings for each, show that Pro2 improves performance by 5-15% when given limited target data compared to prior methods such as standard linear probing.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2023.

Builds on

44 of 66 references.

References · 44

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  4. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  5. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
  6. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  7. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  8. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  9. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  10. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
  11. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  12. 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 915
32 more
  1. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
  2. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
  3. 2014Deep Domain Confusion: Maximizing for Domain Invariancecited by 597
  4. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
  5. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
  6. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 419
  7. 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
  8. 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 364
  9. 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 349
  10. 2014CNN Features off-the-shelf: an Astounding Baseline for Recognitioncited by 316
  11. 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
  12. 2020Gradient Starvation: A Learning Proclivity in Neural Networkscited by 262
  13. 2018Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Linear Convolutional Networkscited by 251
  14. 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 208
  15. 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
  16. 2020Adaptive Risk Minimization: Learning to Adapt to Domain Shiftcited by 183
  17. 2020BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 155
  18. 2022On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 145
  19. 2020Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased Classifiercited by 133
  20. 2022A Whac-A-Mole Dilemma: Shortcuts Come in Multiples Where Mitigating One Amplifies Otherscited by 85
  21. 2021Evading the Simplicity Bias: Training a Diverse Set of Models Discovers Solutions with Superior OOD Generalizationcited by 83
  22. 2022Agree to Disagree: Diversity through Disagreement for Better Transferabilitycited by 69
  23. 2022Domain-Adjusted Regression or: ERM May Already Learn Features Sufficient for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 69
  24. 2022Contrastive Adapters for Foundation Model Group Robustnesscited by 62
  25. 2022Diversify and Disambiguate: Learning From Underspecified Datacited by 55
  26. 2014A survey of dimensionality reduction techniquescited by 50
  27. 2022Mechanistic Mode Connectivitycited by 50
  28. 2020Test-time Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 37
  29. 2023Simplicity Bias in 1-Hidden Layer Neural Networkscited by 26
  30. 2022You Only Need a Good Embeddings Extractor to Fix Spurious Correlationscited by 17
  31. 2019On the Downstream Performance of Compressed Word Embeddingscited by 13
  32. 2022Controlling Directions Orthogonal to a Classifiercited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

9 papers.