mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Transformer-based Response Evaluator for Open-Domain Spoken Conversation

arXiv 2302.04424 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2023cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many open-domain dialogue systems rely on multiple response generators, any of which can contribute a response to the dialogue in a particular context. Thus the ability to compare potential responses and then select the best plays an important role in ensuring a dialogue system is coherent and engaging. Dialogue coherence goes beyond simply remaining on topic -- some trivia may be on topic and engaging when mentioned out of the blue, but may not be coherent and grounded in the context of the conversation. We carry out experiments on response selection in the Athena system, an Alexa Prize SocialBot that has dedicated content and multiple topic-specific response generators for a large number of topics. First, we collect a corpus of Athena conversations with live human traffic, where potential responses from all enabled response generators are logged and subsequently annotated for response quality. We compare several off-the-shelf response ranking methods for open-domain dialogue to Athena-Heuristic, a heuristic response ranker that was field-tested in Athena during the third Alexa Prize competition. We also compare these to a transformer-based response ranker we call Athena-RR, that we train on our Athena conversations. Athena-RR uses both the conversational context and the dialogue state to rank the potential responses. We find that Athena-RR with a Recall@1 of 70.79% outperforms Athena-Heuristic and all of the off-the-shelf rankers by a large margin. We then conduct a live A/B study comparing Athena-Heuristic to Athena-RR in a 6,358 conversations with Alexa users. We show that Athena-RR leads to significantly longer conversations that receive significantly higher user ratings than the heuristic rule-based ranker.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2023.

Builds on

31 of 48 references.

References · 31

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generationcited by 842
  3. 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
  4. 2017DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Datasetcited by 649
  5. 2018Wizard of Wikipedia: Knowledge-Powered Conversational agentscited by 530
  6. 2020Towards a Human-like Open-Domain Chatbotcited by 467
  7. 2016How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generationcited by 356
  8. 2019TransferTransfo: A Transfer Learning Approach for Neural Network Based Conversational Agentscited by 188
  9. 2020USR: An Unsupervised and Reference Free Evaluation Metric for Dialog Generationcited by 186
  10. 2020Unsupervised Evaluation of Interactive Dialog with DialoGPTcited by 139
  11. 2019Survey on Evaluation Methods for Dialogue Systemscited by 126
  12. 2021A Comprehensive Assessment of Dialog Evaluation Metricscited by 90
19 more
  1. 2017RUBER: An Unsupervised Method for Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialog Systemscited by 88
  2. 2020Dialogue Response Ranking Training with Large-Scale Human Feedback Datacited by 68
  3. 2021DynaEval: Unifying Turn and Dialogue Level Evaluationcited by 59
  4. 2019Predictive Engagement: An Efficient Metric For Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialogue Systemscited by 36
  5. 2020Do Response Selection Models Really Know What's Next? Utterance Manipulation Strategies for Multi-turn Response Selectioncited by 36
  6. 2019Towards Coherent and Engaging Spoken Dialog Response Generation Using Automatic Conversation Evaluatorscited by 34
  7. 2018Advancing the State of the Art in Open Domain Dialog Systems through the Alexa Prizecited by 29
  8. 2020Neural Generation Meets Real People: Towards Emotionally Engaging Mixed-Initiative Conversationscited by 24
  9. 2022What is wrong with you?: Leveraging User Sentiment for Automatic Dialog Evaluationcited by 18
  10. 2022FineD-Eval: Fine-grained Automatic Dialogue-Level Evaluationcited by 13
  11. 2018Neural Response Ranking for Social Conversation: A Data-Efficient Approachcited by 9
  12. 2020Athena: Constructing Dialogues Dynamically with Discourse Constraintscited by 7
  13. 2021Jurassic is (almost) All You Need: Few-Shot Meaning-to-Text Generation for Open-Domain Dialoguecited by 6
  14. 2019Entertaining and Opinionated but Too Controlling: A Large-Scale User Study of an Open Domain Alexa Prize Systemcited by 5
  15. 2020Speech Sentiment and Customer Satisfaction Estimation in Socialbot Conversationscited by 5
  16. 2020Alquist 3.0: Alexa Prize Bot Using Conversational Knowledge Graphcited by 5
  17. 2021Proto: A Neural Cocktail for Generating Appealing Conversationscited by 5
  18. 2021Athena 2.0: Contextualized Dialogue Management for an Alexa Prize SocialBotcited by 4
  19. 2022A Systematic Evaluation of Response Selection for Open Domain Dialoguecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4.

4 papers.