mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adapting Pre-trained Vision Transformers from 2D to 3D through Weight Inflation Improves Medical Image Segmentation

arXiv 2302.04303 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2023cs.CVcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given the prevalence of 3D medical imaging technologies such as MRI and CT that are widely used in diagnosing and treating diverse diseases, 3D segmentation is one of the fundamental tasks of medical image analysis. Recently, Transformer-based models have started to achieve state-of-the-art performances across many vision tasks, through pre-training on large-scale natural image benchmark datasets. While works on medical image analysis have also begun to explore Transformer-based models, there is currently no optimal strategy to effectively leverage pre-trained Transformers, primarily due to the difference in dimensionality between 2D natural images and 3D medical images. Existing solutions either split 3D images into 2D slices and predict each slice independently, thereby losing crucial depth-wise information, or modify the Transformer architecture to support 3D inputs without leveraging pre-trained weights. In this work, we use a simple yet effective weight inflation strategy to adapt pre-trained Transformers from 2D to 3D, retaining the benefit of both transfer learning and depth information. We further investigate the effectiveness of transfer from different pre-training sources and objectives. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performances across a broad range of 3D medical image datasets, and can become a standard strategy easily utilized by all work on Transformer-based models for 3D medical images, to maximize performance.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2023.

Builds on

21 of 36 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  5. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  6. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  7. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  8. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  9. 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,360
  10. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  11. 2021ViViT: A Video Vision Transformercited by 1,610
  12. 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,552
9 more
  1. 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,368
  2. 2021Swin-Unet: Unet-like Pure Transformer for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,218
  3. 2021Video Swin Transformercited by 1,090
  4. 2021UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 954
  5. 2021The Medical Segmentation Decathloncited by 620
  6. 2018A Short Note about Kinetics-600cited by 331
  7. 2019On the Relationship between Self-Attention and Convolutional Layerscited by 299
  8. 2021UTNet: A Hybrid Transformer Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 116
  9. 2021MISSFormer: An Effective Medical Image Segmentation Transformercited by 103

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

11 papers.