mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Systematic Performance Analysis of Deep Perceptual Loss Networks: Breaking Transfer Learning Conventions

arXiv 2302.04032 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, deep perceptual loss has been widely and successfully used to train machine learning models for many computer vision tasks, including image synthesis, segmentation, and autoencoding. Deep perceptual loss is a type of loss function for images that computes the error between two images as the distance between deep features extracted from a neural network. Most applications of the loss use pretrained networks called loss networks for deep feature extraction. However, despite increasingly widespread use, the effects of loss network implementation on the trained models have not been studied. This work rectifies this through a systematic evaluation of the effect of different pretrained loss networks on four different application areas. Specifically, the work evaluates 14 different pretrained architectures with four different feature extraction layers. The evaluation reveals that VGG networks without batch normalization have the best performance and that the choice of feature extraction layer is at least as important as the choice of architecture. The analysis also reveals that deep perceptual loss does not adhere to the transfer learning conventions that better ImageNet accuracy implies better downstream performance and that feature extraction from the later layers provides better performance.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2023.

Builds on

53 of 105 references.

References · 53

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  6. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  7. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  8. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  9. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  10. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  11. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  12. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
38 more
  1. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  2. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,678
  3. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  4. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  5. 2016Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 1,898
  6. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  7. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,489
  8. 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,379
  9. 2014Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 1,218
  10. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
  11. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
  12. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  13. 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 792
  14. 2018Recurrent World Models Facilitate Policy Evolutioncited by 761
  15. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
  16. 2015A Neural Algorithm of Artistic Stylecited by 480
  17. 2015Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metriccited by 407
  18. 2019Deep Learning for Image Super-resolution: A Surveycited by 368
  19. 2019Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 366
  20. 2016Adversarial Feature Learningcited by 350
  21. 2015Understanding Neural Networks Through Deep Visualizationcited by 332
  22. 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
  23. 2016Generating Images with Perceptual Similarity Metrics based on Deep Networkscited by 221
  24. 2016Split-Brain Autoencoders: Unsupervised Learning by Cross-Channel Predictioncited by 217
  25. 2017Low Dose CT Image Denoising Using a Generative Adversarial Network with Wasserstein Distance and Perceptual Losscited by 161
  26. 2016Learning Features by Watching Objects Movecited by 138
  27. 2017Beyond the Pixel-Wise Loss for Topology-Aware Delineationcited by 82
  28. 2017Perceptual Generative Adversarial Networks for Small Object Detectioncited by 76
  29. 2022Human alignment of neural network representationscited by 74
  30. 2016Deep Colorizationcited by 70
  31. 2020Efficient Continuous Pareto Exploration in Multi-Task Learningcited by 57
  32. 2019E-LPIPS: Robust Perceptual Image Similarity via Random Transformation Ensemblescited by 44
  33. 2015Learning to Generate Images with Perceptual Similarity Metricscited by 39
  34. 2022Do better ImageNet classifiers assess perceptual similarity better?cited by 34
  35. 2019SROBB: Targeted Perceptual Loss for Single Image Super-Resolutioncited by 31
  36. 2015Data-dependent Initializations of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 29
  37. 2015Is Image Super-resolution Helpful for Other Vision Tasks?cited by 22
  38. 2020Improving Image Autoencoder Embeddings with Perceptual Losscited by 13

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

11 papers.