mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Representations of Bi-level Knowledge Graphs for Reasoning beyond Link Prediction

arXiv 2302.02601 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Knowledge graphs represent known facts using triplets. While existing knowledge graph embedding methods only consider the connections between entities, we propose considering the relationships between triplets. For example, let us consider two triplets T1 and T2 where T1 is (AcademyAwards, Nominates, Avatar) and T2 is (Avatar, Wins, AcademyAwards). Given these two base-level triplets, we see that T1 is a prerequisite for T2. In this paper, we define a higher-level triplet to represent a relationship between triplets, e.g., langle T1, PrerequisiteFor, T2rangle where PrerequisiteFor is a higher-level relation. We define a bi-level knowledge graph that consists of the base-level and the higher-level triplets. We also propose a data augmentation strategy based on the random walks on the bi-level knowledge graph to augment plausible triplets. Our model called BiVE learns embeddings by taking into account the structures of the base-level and the higher-level triplets, with additional consideration of the augmented triplets. We propose two new tasks: triplet prediction and conditional link prediction. Given a triplet T1 and a higher-level relation, the triplet prediction predicts a triplet that is likely to be connected to T1 by the higher-level relation, e.g., langle T1, PrerequisiteFor, ?rangle. The conditional link prediction predicts a missing entity in a triplet conditioned on another triplet, e.g., langle T1, PrerequisiteFor, (Avatar, Wins, ?)rangle. Experimental results show that BiVE significantly outperforms all other methods in the two new tasks and the typical base-level link prediction in real-world bi-level knowledge graphs.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2023.

Builds on

21 of 43 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applicationscited by 643
  2. 2021QA-GNN: Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Question Answeringcited by 386
  3. 2017DeepPath: A Reinforcement Learning Method for Knowledge Graph Reasoningcited by 265
  4. 2020Low-Dimensional Hyperbolic Knowledge Graph Embeddingscited by 195
  5. 2019Quaternion Knowledge Graph Embeddingscited by 175
  6. 2019DRUM: End-To-End Differentiable Rule Mining On Knowledge Graphscited by 173
  7. 2017Go for a Walk and Arrive at the Answer: Reasoning Over Paths in Knowledge Bases using Reinforcement Learningcited by 161
  8. 2018Multi-Hop Knowledge Graph Reasoning with Reward Shapingcited by 102
  9. 2019ASER: A Large-scale Eventuality Knowledge Graphcited by 89
  10. 2019Hierarchical Graph Network for Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 83
  11. 2017Analogical Inference for Multi-Relational Embeddingscited by 69
  12. 2015Modeling Relation Paths for Representation Learning of Knowledge Basescited by 56
9 more
  1. 2021Universal Representation Learning of Knowledge Bases by Jointly Embedding Instances and Ontological Conceptscited by 37
  2. 2018Incorporating Literals into Knowledge Graph Embeddingscited by 29
  3. 2021ConditionalQA: A Complex Reading Comprehension Dataset with Conditional Answerscited by 29
  4. 2017KBLRN : End-to-End Learning of Knowledge Base Representations with Latent, Relational, and Numerical Featurescited by 25
  5. 2016Lifted Rule Injection for Relation Embeddingscited by 22
  6. 2021BiQUE: Biquaternionic Embeddings of Knowledge Graphscited by 19
  7. 2019Rule-Guided Compositional Representation Learning on Knowledge Graphscited by 16
  8. 2019LogicENN: A Neural Based Knowledge Graphs Embedding Model with Logical Rulescited by 8
  9. 2018Weakly-supervised Contextualization of Knowledge Graph Factscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

9 papers.