TwinExplainer: Explaining Predictions of an Automotive Digital Twin
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vehicles are complex Cyber Physical Systems (CPS) that operate in a variety of environments, and the likelihood of failure of one or more subsystems, such as the engine, transmission, brakes, and fuel, can result in unscheduled downtime and incur high maintenance or repair costs. In order to prevent these issues, it is crucial to continuously monitor the health of various subsystems and identify abnormal sensor channel behavior. Data-driven Digital Twin (DT) systems are capable of such a task. Current DT technologies utilize various Deep Learning (DL) techniques that are constrained by the lack of justification or explanation for their predictions. This inability of these opaque systems can influence decision-making and raises user trust concerns. This paper presents a solution to this issue, where the TwinExplainer system, with its three-layered architectural pipeline, explains the predictions of an automotive DT. Such a system can assist automotive stakeholders in understanding the global scale of the sensor channels and how they contribute towards generic DT predictions. TwinExplainer can also visualize explanations for both normal and abnormal local predictions computed by the DT.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2023.
Builds on
14 of 41 references.
References · 14
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,447
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 657
- 2017Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Modelscited by 202
- 2022Explainable Intrusion Detection Systems (X-IDS): A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 25
- 2019A Survey of Predictive Maintenance: Systems, Purposes and Approachescited by 21
- 2018Global Model Interpretation via Recursive Partitioningcited by 17
- 2022Creating an Explainable Intrusion Detection System Using Self Organizing Mapscited by 6
- 2022A Temporal Anomaly Detection System for Vehicles utilizing Functional Working Groups and Sensor Channelscited by 5
- 2022Explainable Human-in-the-loop Dynamic Data-Driven Digital Twinscited by 3
2 more
- 2022A White-Box Adversarial Attack Against a Digital Twincited by 2
- 2019Digital Twin approach to Clinical DSS with Explainable AIcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4.
6 papers.
- 2023Security Considerations in AI-Robotics: A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 9
- 2023Impacts and Risk of Generative AI Technology on Cyber Defensecited by 8
- 2024Large Language Models for Explainable Decisions in Dynamic Digital Twinscited by 3
- 2024A Survey on Privacy Attacks Against Digital Twin Systems in AI-Roboticscited by 3
- 2024Explainable Interface for Human-Autonomy Teaming: A Surveycited by 2
- 2024Explainable Anomaly Detection: Counterfactual driven What-If Analysiscited by 1
- 2024Explainable Anomaly Detection: Counterfactual driven What-If Analysis21 Aug 2024
- 2024A Survey on Privacy Attacks Against Digital Twin Systems in AI-Robotics27 Jun 2024
- 2024Large Language Models for Explainable Decisions in Dynamic Digital Twins23 May 2024
- 2024Explainable Interface for Human-Autonomy Teaming: A Survey4 May 2024
- 2023Security Considerations in AI-Robotics: A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities12 Oct 2023
- 2023Impacts and Risk of Generative AI Technology on Cyber Defense22 Jun 2023