Interpreting Robustness Proofs of Deep Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years numerous methods have been developed to formally verify the robustness of deep neural networks (DNNs). Though the proposed techniques are effective in providing mathematical guarantees about the DNNs behavior, it is not clear whether the proofs generated by these methods are human-interpretable. In this paper, we bridge this gap by developing new concepts, algorithms, and representations to generate human understandable interpretations of the proofs. Leveraging the proposed method, we show that the robustness proofs of standard DNNs rely on spurious input features, while the proofs of DNNs trained to be provably robust filter out even the semantically meaningful features. The proofs for the DNNs combining adversarial and provably robust training are the most effective at selectively filtering out spurious features as well as relying on human-understandable input features.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2023.
Builds on
29 of 48 references.
References · 29
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
- 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 439
17 more
- 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 322
- 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 312
- 2020Understanding the Role of Individual Units in a Deep Neural Networkcited by 254
- 2017Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networkscited by 241
- 2021Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Complete and Incomplete Neural Network Robustness Verificationcited by 224
- 2019Towards Stable and Efficient Training of Verifiably Robust Neural Networkscited by 204
- 2018Efficient Formal Safety Analysis of Neural Networkscited by 165
- 2019Branch and Bound for Piecewise Linear Neural Network Verificationcited by 138
- 2019A Convex Relaxation Barrier to Tight Robustness Verification of Neural Networkscited by 124
- 2018Strong mixed-integer programming formulations for trained neural networkscited by 115
- 2022General Cutting Planes for Bound-Propagation-Based Neural Network Verificationcited by 102
- 2022Complete Verification via Multi-Neuron Relaxation Guided Branch-and-Boundcited by 92
- 2021Leveraging Sparse Linear Layers for Debuggable Deep Networkscited by 82
- 2020Evaluations and Methods for Explanation through Robustness Analysiscited by 51
- 2020Scaling Polyhedral Neural Network Verification on GPUscited by 43
- 2020Fast Geometric Projections for Local Robustness Certificationcited by 21
- 2020An efficient nonconvex reformulation of stagewise convex optimization problemscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
3 papers.