mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An investigation of challenges encountered when specifying training data and runtime monitors for safety critical ML applications

arXiv 2301.13476 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2023cs.SE cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Context and motivation: The development and operation of critical software that contains machine learning (ML) models requires diligence and established processes. Especially the training data used during the development of ML models have major influences on the later behaviour of the system. Runtime monitors are used to provide guarantees for that behaviour. Question / problem: We see major uncertainty in how to specify training data and runtime monitoring for critical ML models and by this specifying the final functionality of the system. In this interview-based study we investigate the underlying challenges for these difficulties. Principal ideas/results: Based on ten interviews with practitioners who develop ML models for critical applications in the automotive and telecommunication sector, we identified 17 underlying challenges in 6 challenge groups that relate to the challenge of specifying training data and runtime monitoring. Contribution: The article provides a list of the identified underlying challenges related to the difficulties practitioners experience when specifying training data and runtime monitoring for ML models. Furthermore, interconnection between the challenges were found and based on these connections recommendation proposed to overcome the root causes for the challenges.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2023.

Builds on

25 of 55 references.

References · 25

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  2. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
  3. 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 377
  4. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 344
  5. 2020REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 136
  6. 2019Taxonomy of Real Faults in Deep Learning Systemscited by 90
  7. 2021A Survey on Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 84
  8. 2022From Concept Drift to Model Degradation: An Overview on Performance-Aware Drift Detectorscited by 83
  9. 2020CASIA-SURF CeFA: A Benchmark for Multi-modal Cross-ethnicity Face Anti-spoofingcited by 66
  10. 2019A Comprehensive Study on Deep Learning Bug Characteristicscited by 65
  11. 2019Requirements Engineering for Machine Learning: Perspectives from Data Scientistscited by 49
  12. 2021Sample Selection for Fair and Robust Trainingcited by 48
13 more
  1. 2018Safely Entering the Deep: A Review of Verification and Validation for Machine Learning and a Challenge Elicitation in the Automotive Industrycited by 38
  2. 2020Deflating Dataset Bias Using Synthetic Data Augmentationcited by 38
  3. 2021DeepLocalize: Fault Localization for Deep Neural Networkscited by 38
  4. 2018Runtime Monitoring Neuron Activation Patternscited by 34
  5. 2020Towards Characterizing Adversarial Defects of Deep Learning Software from the Lens of Uncertaintycited by 26
  6. 2019Challenges in Designing Datasets and Validation for Autonomous Drivingcited by 23
  7. 2020Model Assertions for Monitoring and Improving ML Modelscited by 22
  8. 2021Rethinking Common Assumptions to Mitigate Racial Bias in Face Recognition Datasetscited by 22
  9. 2022Potential sources of dataset bias complicate investigation of underdiagnosis by machine learning algorithmscited by 19
  10. 2021MLDemon: Deployment Monitoring for Machine Learning Systemscited by 14
  11. 2021Non-functional Requirements for Machine Learning: Understanding Current Use and Challenges in Industrycited by 9
  12. 2020Increasing Trustworthiness of Deep Neural Networks via Accuracy Monitoringcited by 3
  13. 2022Setting AI in context: A case study on defining the context and operational design domain for automated drivingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

4 papers.