Diverse, Difficult, and Odd Instances (D2O): A New Test Set for Object Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Test sets are an integral part of evaluating models and gauging progress in object recognition, and more broadly in computer vision and AI. Existing test sets for object recognition, however, suffer from shortcomings such as bias towards the ImageNet characteristics and idiosyncrasies (e.g., ImageNet-V2), being limited to certain types of stimuli (e.g., indoor scenes in ObjectNet), and underestimating the model performance (e.g., ImageNet-A). To mitigate these problems, we introduce a new test set, called D2O, which is sufficiently different from existing test sets. Images are a mix of generated images as well as images crawled from the web. They are diverse, unmodified, and representative of real-world scenarios and cause state-of-the-art models to misclassify them with high confidence. To emphasize generalization, our dataset by design does not come paired with a training set. It contains 8,060 images spread across 36 categories, out of which 29 appear in ImageNet. The best Top-1 accuracy on our dataset is around 60% which is much lower than 91% best Top-1 accuracy on ImageNet. We find that popular vision APIs perform very poorly in detecting objects over D2O categories such as ``faces'', ``cars'', and ``cats''. Our dataset also comes with a ``miscellaneous'' category, over which we test the image tagging models. Overall, our investigations demonstrate that the D2O test set contain a mix of images with varied levels of difficulty and is predictive of the average-case performance of models. It can challenge object recognition models for years to come and can spur more research in this fundamental area.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2023.
Builds on
27 of 44 references.
References · 27
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
15 more
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
- 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 605
- 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 454
- 2020Are we done with ImageNet?cited by 333
- 2018Generalisation in humans and deep neural networkscited by 237
- 2020Identifying Statistical Bias in Dataset Replicationcited by 24
- 2017Do Deep Neural Networks Suffer from Crowding?cited by 7
- 2021Natural Adversarial Objectscited by 7
- 2021Contemplating real-world object classificationcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.