Do Deep Neural Networks Suffer from Crowding?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Crowding is a visual effect suffered by humans, in which an object that can be recognized in isolation can no longer be recognized when other objects, called flankers, are placed close to it. In this work, we study the effect of crowding in artificial Deep Neural Networks for object recognition. We analyze both standard deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) as well as a new version of DCNNs which is 1) multi-scale and 2) with size of the convolution filters change depending on the eccentricity wrt to the center of fixation. Such networks, that we call eccentricity-dependent, are a computational model of the feedforward path of the primate visual cortex. Our results reveal that the eccentricity-dependent model, trained on target objects in isolation, can recognize such targets in the presence of flankers, if the targets are near the center of the image, whereas DCNNs cannot. Also, for all tested networks, when trained on targets in isolation, we find that recognition accuracy of the networks decreases the closer the flankers are to the target and the more flankers there are. We find that visual similarity between the target and flankers also plays a role and that pooling in early layers of the network leads to more crowding. Additionally, we show that incorporating the flankers into the images of the training set does not improve performance with crowding.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
7 papers.
- 2021Contemplating real-world object classificationcited by 6
- 2022Is current research on adversarial robustness addressing the right problem?cited by 2
- 2021The Foes of Neural Network's Data Efficiency Among Unnecessary Input Dimensionscited by 1
- 2024FovEx: Human-Inspired Explanations for Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2021Predicting decision-making in the future: Human versus Machinecited by 0
- 2023Diverse, Difficult, and Odd Instances (D2O): A New Test Set for Object Classificationcited by 0
- 2023Breast Cancer classification by adaptive weighted average ensemble of previously trained modelscited by 0
- 2024FovEx: Human-Inspired Explanations for Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks4 Aug 2024
- 2023Breast Cancer classification by adaptive weighted average ensemble of previously trained models22 Nov 2023
- 2023Diverse, Difficult, and Odd Instances (D2O): A New Test Set for Object Classification29 Jan 2023
- 2022Is current research on adversarial robustness addressing the right problem?31 Jul 2022
- 2021Predicting decision-making in the future: Human versus Machine9 Oct 2021
- 2021The Foes of Neural Network's Data Efficiency Among Unnecessary Input Dimensions13 Jul 2021
- 2021Contemplating real-world object classification8 Mar 2021