A new Taxonomy of Continuous Global Optimization Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Surrogate-based optimization, nature-inspired metaheuristics, and hybrid combinations have become state of the art in algorithm design for solving real-world optimization problems. Still, it is difficult for practitioners to get an overview that explains their advantages in comparison to a large number of available methods in the scope of optimization. Available taxonomies lack the embedding of current approaches in the larger context of this broad field. This article presents a taxonomy of the field, which explores and matches algorithm strategies by extracting similarities and differences in their search strategies. A particular focus lies on algorithms using surrogates, nature-inspired designs, and those created by design optimization. The extracted features of components or operators allow us to create a set of classification indicators to distinguish between a small number of classes. The features allow a deeper understanding of components of the search strategies and further indicate the close connections between the different algorithm designs. We present intuitive analogies to explain the basic principles of the search algorithms, particularly useful for novices in this research field. Furthermore, this taxonomy allows recommendations for the applicability of the corresponding algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1.
2 papers.
- 2021Evolving Continuous Optimisers from Scratchcited by 3
- 2023RF+clust for Leave-One-Problem-Out Performance Predictioncited by 3
- 2023RF+clust for Leave-One-Problem-Out Performance Prediction23 Jan 2023
- 2021Evolving Continuous Optimisers from Scratch22 Mar 2021