mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

WDC Products: A Multi-Dimensional Entity Matching Benchmark

arXiv 2301.09521 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2023cs.LGcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The difficulty of an entity matching task depends on a combination of multiple factors such as the amount of corner-case pairs, the fraction of entities in the test set that have not been seen during training, and the size of the development set. Current entity matching benchmarks usually represent single points in the space along such dimensions or they provide for the evaluation of matching methods along a single dimension, for instance the amount of training data. This paper presents WDC Products, an entity matching benchmark which provides for the systematic evaluation of matching systems along combinations of three dimensions while relying on real-world data. The three dimensions are (i) amount of corner-cases (ii) generalization to unseen entities, and (iii) development set size (training set plus validation set). Generalization to unseen entities is a dimension not covered by any of the existing English-language benchmarks yet but is crucial for evaluating the robustness of entity matching systems. Instead of learning how to match entity pairs, entity matching can also be formulated as a multi-class classification task that requires the matcher to recognize individual entities. WDC Products is the first benchmark that provides a pair-wise and a multi-class formulation of the same tasks. We evaluate WDC Products using several state-of-the-art matching systems, including Ditto, HierGAT, and R-SupCon. The evaluation shows that all matching systems struggle with unseen entities to varying degrees. It also shows that for entity matching contrastive learning is more training data efficient compared to cross-encoders.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2023.

Builds on

21 of 55 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,106
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,304
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,322
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,009
  5. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,838
  6. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,811
  7. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,170
  8. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 799
  9. 2021Optimizing Dense Retrieval Model Training with Hard Negativescited by 155
  10. 2020Deep Entity Matching with Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 144
  11. 2020In Search of Robust Measures of Generalizationcited by 79
  12. 2021Annotating Columns with Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 37
9 more
  1. 2020Neural Networks for Entity Matching: A Surveycited by 33
  2. 2022Supervised Contrastive Learning for Product Matchingcited by 24
  3. 2022Sudowoodo: Contrastive Self-supervised Learning for Multi-purpose Data Integration and Preparationcited by 19
  4. 2021Machamp: A Generalized Entity Matching Benchmarkcited by 16
  5. 2022DAME: Domain Adaptation for Matching Entitiescited by 9
  6. 2020Deep Hierarchical Classification for Category Prediction in E-commerce Systemcited by 8
  7. 2021Alaska: A Flexible Benchmark for Data Integration Taskscited by 7
  8. 2022FlexER: Flexible Entity Resolution for Multiple Intentscited by 6
  9. 2021CollaborER: A Self-supervised Entity Resolution Framework Using Multi-features Collaborationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 8.

17 papers.

Sort: