mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Suboptimality analysis of receding horizon quadratic control with unknown linear systems and its applications in learning-based control

arXiv 2301.07876 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2023eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work analyzes how the trade-off between the modeling error, the terminal value function error, and the prediction horizon affects the performance of a nominal receding-horizon linear quadratic (LQ) controller. By developing a novel perturbation result of the Riccati difference equation, a novel performance upper bound is obtained and suggests that for many cases, the prediction horizon can be either one or infinity to improve the control performance, depending on the relative difference between the modeling error and the terminal value function error. The result also shows that when an infinite horizon is desired, a finite prediction horizon that is larger than the controllability index can be sufficient for achieving a near-optimal performance, revealing a close relation between the prediction horizon and controllability. The obtained suboptimality performance upper bound is applied to provide novel sample complexity and regret guarantees for nominal receding-horizon LQ controllers in a learning-based setting. We show that an adaptive prediction horizon that increases as a logarithmic function of time is beneficial for regret minimization.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2023.

Builds on

26 of 65 references.

References · 26

  1. 2018Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods for the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 250
  2. 2017On the Sample Complexity of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 159
  3. 2018Learning Without Mixing: Towards A Sharp Analysis of Linear System Identificationcited by 158
  4. 2018A Tour of Reinforcement Learning: The View from Continuous Controlcited by 151
  5. 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 116
  6. 2018Near optimal finite time identification of arbitrary linear dynamical systemscited by 89
  7. 2018Regret Bounds for Robust Adaptive Control of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 86
  8. 2018Online Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 56
  9. 2022Statistical Learning Theory for Control: A Finite Sample Perspectivecited by 53
  10. 2019Convergence and sample complexity of gradient methods for the model-free linear quadratic regulator problemcited by 46
  11. 2019Online Optimal Control with Linear Dynamics and Predictions: Algorithms and Regret Analysiscited by 40
  12. 2018Safely Learning to Control the Constrained Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 33
14 more
  1. 2020The Power of Predictions in Online Controlcited by 31
  2. 2021On the Regret Analysis of Online LQR Control with Predictionscited by 22
  3. 2019From self-tuning regulators to reinforcement learning and back againcited by 17
  4. 2020Sample Complexity of Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) Control for Output Feedback Systemscited by 16
  5. 2022Learning to Control Linear Systems can be Hardcited by 11
  6. 2021Optimization of the Model Predictive Control Meta-Parameters Through Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  7. 2021Regret Analysis of Learning-Based MPC with Partially-Unknown Cost Functioncited by 5
  8. 2022Predictive Control with Learning-Based Terminal Costs Using Approximate Value Iterationcited by 5
  9. 2016Adaptive Horizon Model Predictive Controlcited by 4
  10. 2022Real-time Model Predictive Control and System Identification Using Differentiable Physics Simulationcited by 4
  11. 2021Online Learning for Predictive Control with Provable Regret Guaranteescited by 3
  12. 2022Performance Bounds of Model Predictive Control for Unconstrained and Constrained Linear Quadratic Problems and Beyondcited by 3
  13. 2021Stability and performance analysis of NMPC: Detectable stage costs and general terminal costscited by 1
  14. 2021Performance bounds of adaptive MPC with bounded parameter uncertaintiescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.