Nonmyopic Global Optimisation via Approximate Dynamic Programming
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Global optimisation to optimise expensive-to-evaluate black-box functions without gradient information. Bayesian optimisation, one of the most well-known techniques, typically employs Gaussian processes as surrogate models, leveraging their probabilistic nature to balance exploration and exploitation. However, these processes become computationally prohibitive in high-dimensional spaces. Recent alternatives, based on inverse distance weighting (IDW) and radial basis functions (RBFs), offer competitive, computationally lighter solutions. Despite their efficiency, both traditional global and Bayesian optimisation strategies suffer from the myopic nature of their acquisition functions, which focus on immediate improvement neglecting future implications of the sequential decision making process. Nonmyopic acquisition functions devised for the Bayesian setting have shown promise in improving long-term performance. Yet, their combination with deterministic surrogate models remains unexplored. In this work, we introduce novel nonmyopic acquisition strategies tailored to IDW and RBF based on approximate dynamic programming paradigms, including rollout and multi-step scenario-based optimisation schemes, to enable lookahead acquisition. These methods optimise a sequence of query points over a horizon by predicting the evolution of the surrogate model, inherently managing the exploration-exploitation trade-off via optimisation techniques. The proposed approach represents a significant advance in extending nonmyopic acquisition principles, previously confined to Bayesian optimisation, to deterministic models. Empirical results on synthetic and hyperparameter tuning benchmark problems, a constrained problem, as well as on a data-driven predictive control application, demonstrate that these nonmyopic methods outperform conventional myopic approaches, leading to faster and more robust convergence.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2024.
Builds on
17 of 60 references.
References · 17
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2017Max-value Entropy Search for Efficient Bayesian Optimizationcited by 202
- 2013A Literature Survey of Benchmark Functions For Global Optimization Problemscited by 75
- 2020Efficient Nonmyopic Bayesian Optimization via One-Shot Multi-Step Treescited by 41
- 2015GLASSES: Relieving The Myopia Of Bayesian Optimisationcited by 38
- 2019BINOCULARS for Efficient, Nonmyopic Sequential Experimental Designcited by 35
- 2020Global Optimization of Objective Functions Represented by ReLU Networkscited by 24
- 2019Why Non-myopic Bayesian Optimization is Promising and How Far Should We Look-ahead? A Study via Rolloutcited by 23
- 2013The Scenario Approach for Stochastic Model Predictive Control with Bounds on Closed-Loop Constraint Violationscited by 19
- 2020Efficient Rollout Strategies for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 19
- 2021A Nonmyopic Approach to Cost-Constrained Bayesian Optimizationcited by 18
- 2019Global optimization via inverse distance weighting and radial basis functionscited by 16
5 more
- 2020A Data-Driven Automatic Tuning Method for MPC under Uncertainty using Constrained Bayesian Optimizationcited by 15
- 2022Active Learning for Regression by Inverse Distance Weightingcited by 9
- 2022Learning safety in model-based Reinforcement Learning using MPC and Gaussian Processescited by 3
- 2022Rollout Algorithms and Approximate Dynamic Programming for Bayesian Optimization and Sequential Estimationcited by 3
- 2023Suboptimality analysis of receding horizon quadratic control with unknown linear systems and its applications in learning-based controlcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.