mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Jamming Attacks on Decentralized Federated Learning in General Multi-Hop Wireless Networks

arXiv 2301.05250 ↗First posted 12 Jan 2023cs.NI cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Decentralized federated learning (DFL) is an effective approach to train a deep learning model at multiple nodes over a multi-hop network, without the need of a server having direct connections to all nodes. In general, as long as nodes are connected potentially via multiple hops, the DFL process will eventually allow each node to experience the effects of models from all other nodes via either direct connections or multi-hop paths, and thus is able to train a high-fidelity model at each node. We consider an effective attack that uses jammers to prevent the model exchanges between nodes. There are two attack scenarios. First, the adversary can attack any link under a certain budget. Once attacked, two end nodes of a link cannot exchange their models. Secondly, some jammers with limited jamming ranges are deployed in the network and a jammer can only jam nodes within its jamming range. Once a directional link is attacked, the receiver node cannot receive the model from the transmitter node. We design algorithms to select links to be attacked for both scenarios. For the second scenario, we also design algorithms to deploy jammers at optimal locations so that they can attack critical nodes and achieve the highest impact on the DFL process. We evaluate these algorithms by using wireless signal classification over a large network area as the use case and identify how these attack mechanisms exploits various learning, connectivity, and sensing aspects. We show that the DFL performance can be significantly reduced by jamming attacks launched in a wireless network and characterize the attack surface as a vulnerability study before the safe deployment of DFL over wireless networks.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2023.

Builds on

18 of 28 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  2. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
  3. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
  4. 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 826
  5. 2019Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applicationscited by 409
  6. 2019Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 407
  7. 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 346
  8. 2020Threats to Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 171
  9. 2019Peer-to-peer Federated Learning on Graphscited by 85
  10. 2021Decentralized Federated Learning: Balancing Communication and Computing Costscited by 54
  11. 2020Deep Learning for Wireless Communicationscited by 39
  12. 2019Deep Learning for RF Signal Classification in Unknown and Dynamic Spectrum Environmentscited by 28
6 more
  1. 2020Adversarial Machine Learning in Wireless Communications using RF Data: A Reviewcited by 25
  2. 2020When Wireless Security Meets Machine Learning: Motivation, Challenges, and Research Directionscited by 12
  3. 2018Deep Learning Classification of 3.5 GHz Band Spectrograms with Applications to Spectrum Sensingcited by 11
  4. 2022Federated Learning for Distributed Spectrum Sensing in NextG Communication Networkscited by 7
  5. 2022Jamming Attacks on Federated Learning in Wireless Networkscited by 6
  6. 2022Free-Rider Games for Federated Learning with Selfish Clients in NextG Wireless Networkscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 3.

4 papers.