mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Difficulty-based Sample Weighting with a Universal Difficulty Measure

arXiv 2301.04850 ↗First posted 12 Jan 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sample weighting is widely used in deep learning. A large number of weighting methods essentially utilize the learning difficulty of training samples to calculate their weights. In this study, this scheme is called difficulty-based weighting. Two important issues arise when explaining this scheme. First, a unified difficulty measure that can be theoretically guaranteed for training samples does not exist. The learning difficulties of the samples are determined by multiple factors including noise level, imbalance degree, margin, and uncertainty. Nevertheless, existing measures only consider a single factor or in part, but not in their entirety. Second, a comprehensive theoretical explanation is lacking with respect to demonstrating why difficulty-based weighting schemes are effective in deep learning. In this study, we theoretically prove that the generalization error of a sample can be used as a universal difficulty measure. Furthermore, we provide formal theoretical justifications on the role of difficulty-based weighting for deep learning, consequently revealing its positive influences on both the optimization dynamics and generalization performance of deep models, which is instructive to existing weighting schemes.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2023.

Builds on

24 of 37 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  3. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  4. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,239
  5. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
  6. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
  7. 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
  8. 2020Asymmetric Loss For Multi-Label Classificationcited by 379
  9. 2019Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 308
  10. 2020Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Wide Two-layer Neural Networks Trained with the Logistic Losscited by 267
  11. 2018What is the Effect of Importance Weighting in Deep Learning?cited by 250
  12. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
12 more
  1. 2021Distribution Alignment: A Unified Framework for Long-tail Visual Recognitioncited by 198
  2. 2015Cost Sensitive Learning of Deep Feature Representations from Imbalanced Datacited by 167
  3. 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
  4. 2018Gradient Harmonized Single-stage Detectorcited by 114
  5. 2018Large Margin Deep Networks for Classificationcited by 110
  6. 2020Rethinking Bias-Variance Trade-off for Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 107
  7. 2020Estimating Example Difficulty Using Variance of Gradientscited by 96
  8. 2020Denoising Implicit Feedback for Recommendationcited by 80
  9. 2018Quantifying Uncertainties in Natural Language Processing Taskscited by 79
  10. 2021Understanding the role of importance weighting for deep learningcited by 38
  11. 2021Which Samples Should be Learned First: Easy or Hard?cited by 12
  12. 2020Which Strategies Matter for Noisy Label Classification? Insight into Loss and Uncertaintycited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

9 papers.