mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

tieval: An Evaluation Framework for Temporal Information Extraction Systems

arXiv 2301.04643 ↗First posted 11 Jan 2023cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Temporal information extraction (TIE) has attracted a great deal of interest over the last two decades, leading to the development of a significant number of datasets. Despite its benefits, having access to a large volume of corpora makes it difficult when it comes to benchmark TIE systems. On the one hand, different datasets have different annotation schemes, thus hindering the comparison between competitors across different corpora. On the other hand, the fact that each corpus is commonly disseminated in a different format requires a considerable engineering effort for a researcher/practitioner to develop parsers for all of them. This constraint forces researchers to select a limited amount of datasets to evaluate their systems which consequently limits the comparability of the systems. Yet another obstacle that hinders the comparability of the TIE systems is the evaluation metric employed. While most research works adopt traditional metrics such as precision, recall, and F1, a few others prefer temporal awareness -- a metric tailored to be more comprehensive on the evaluation of temporal systems. Although the reason for the absence of temporal awareness in the evaluation of most systems is not clear, one of the factors that certainly weights this decision is the necessity to implement the temporal closure algorithm in order to compute temporal awareness, which is not straightforward to implement neither is currently easily available. All in all, these problems have limited the fair comparison between approaches and consequently, the development of temporal extraction systems. To mitigate these problems, we have developed tieval, a Python library that provides a concise interface for importing different corpora and facilitates system evaluation. In this paper, we present the first public release of tieval and highlight its most relevant features.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2023.

Builds on

8 of 50 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  2. 2019"Going on a vacation" takes longer than "Going for a walk": A Study of Temporal Commonsense Understandingcited by 121
  3. 2018A Multi-Axis Annotation Scheme for Event Temporal Relationscited by 73
  4. 2020TORQUE: A Reading Comprehension Dataset of Temporal Ordering Questionscited by 65
  5. 2019Joint Reasoning for Temporal and Causal Relationscited by 60
  6. 2019An Improved Neural Baseline for Temporal Relation Extractioncited by 32
  7. 2018Improving Temporal Relation Extraction with a Globally Acquired Statistical Resourcecited by 17
  8. 2020A Survey on Temporal Reasoning for Temporal Information Extraction from Text (Extended Abstract)cited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.