mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Study on the Generality of Neural Network Structures for Monocular Depth Estimation

arXiv 2301.03169 ↗First posted 9 Jan 2023cs.CV cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Monocular depth estimation has been widely studied, and significant improvements in performance have been recently reported. However, most previous works are evaluated on a few benchmark datasets, such as KITTI datasets, and none of the works provide an in-depth analysis of the generalization performance of monocular depth estimation. In this paper, we deeply investigate the various backbone networks (e.g.CNN and Transformer models) toward the generalization of monocular depth estimation. First, we evaluate state-of-the-art models on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution datasets, which have never been seen during network training. Then, we investigate the internal properties of the representations from the intermediate layers of CNN-/Transformer-based models using synthetic texture-shifted datasets. Through extensive experiments, we observe that the Transformers exhibit a strong shape-bias rather than CNNs, which have a strong texture-bias. We also discover that texture-biased models exhibit worse generalization performance for monocular depth estimation than shape-biased models. We demonstrate that similar aspects are observed in real-world driving datasets captured under diverse environments. Lastly, we conduct a dense ablation study with various backbone networks which are utilized in modern strategies. The experiments demonstrate that the intrinsic locality of the CNNs and the self-attention of the Transformers induce texture-bias and shape-bias, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 66 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2023.

Builds on

66 of 93 references.

References · 66

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  6. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  7. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  8. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  9. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  10. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  11. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  12. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
38 more
  1. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
  2. 2021Vision Transformers for Dense Predictioncited by 1,789
  3. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  4. 2018UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,518
  5. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  6. 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,368
  7. 2014Depth Map Prediction from a Single Image using a Multi-Scale Deep Networkcited by 1,264
  8. 2018Dual Attention Network for Scene Segmentationcited by 1,001
  9. 2016Unsupervised Monocular Depth Estimation with Left-Right Consistencycited by 819
  10. 2018Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 809
  11. 2017Unsupervised Learning of Depth and Ego-Motion from Videocited by 778
  12. 2018Deep Ordinal Regression Network for Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 721
  13. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
  14. 2020AdaBins: Depth Estimation using Adaptive Binscited by 596
  15. 2021Twins: Revisiting the Design of Spatial Attention in Vision Transformerscited by 565
  16. 2014Predicting Depth, Surface Normals and Semantic Labels with a Common Multi-Scale Convolutional Architecturecited by 483
  17. 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
  18. 20193D Packing for Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 437
  19. 2017Semantic Foggy Scene Understanding with Synthetic Datacited by 401
  20. 2019From Big to Small: Multi-Scale Local Planar Guidance for Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 379
  21. 2017Sparsity Invariant CNNscited by 325
  22. 2019Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNetcited by 260
  23. 2021Understanding Robustness of Transformers for Image Classificationcited by 250
  24. 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 208
  25. 2016DeMoN: Depth and Motion Network for Learning Monocular Stereocited by 200
  26. 2020Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation: Solving the Dynamic Object Problem by Semantic Guidancecited by 148
  27. 2022More ConvNets in the 2020s: Scaling up Kernels Beyond 51x51 using Sparsitycited by 142
  28. 2022MonoViT: Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation with a Vision Transformercited by 136
  29. 2021RegionViT: Regional-to-Local Attention for Vision Transformerscited by 126
  30. 2021Transformer-Based Attention Networks for Continuous Pixel-Wise Predictioncited by 125
  31. 2022DepthFormer: Exploiting Long-Range Correlation and Local Information for Accurate Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 116
  32. 2020HR-Depth: High Resolution Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 115
  33. 2021Are Convolutional Neural Networks or Transformers more like human vision?cited by 109
  34. 2021Delving Deep into the Generalization of Vision Transformers under Distribution Shiftscited by 85
  35. 2020Convolutional Neural Networks as a Model of the Visual System: Past, Present, and Futurecited by 83
  36. 2019How do neural networks see depth in single images?cited by 82
  37. 2021Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation with Internal Feature Fusioncited by 67
  38. 2022Multi-Frame Self-Supervised Depth with Transformerscited by 64

50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.