Training Differentially Private Graph Neural Networks with Random Walk Sampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning models are known to put the privacy of their training data at risk, which poses challenges for their safe and ethical release to the public. Differentially private stochastic gradient descent is the de facto standard for training neural networks without leaking sensitive information about the training data. However, applying it to models for graph-structured data poses a novel challenge: unlike with i.i.d. data, sensitive information about a node in a graph cannot only leak through its gradients, but also through the gradients of all nodes within a larger neighborhood. In practice, this limits privacy-preserving deep learning on graphs to very shallow graph neural networks. We propose to solve this issue by training graph neural networks on disjoint subgraphs of a given training graph. We develop three random-walk-based methods for generating such disjoint subgraphs and perform a careful analysis of the data-generating distributions to provide strong privacy guarantees. Through extensive experiments, we show that our method greatly outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline on three large graphs, and matches or outperforms it on four smaller ones.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2023.
Builds on
17 of 21 references.
References · 17
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
- 2019GraphSAINT: Graph Sampling Based Inductive Learning Methodcited by 618
- 2021Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learnerscited by 405
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
- 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 234
- 2021Large-Scale Differentially Private BERTcited by 117
- 2014Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization: Efficient Algorithms and Tight Error Boundscited by 104
- 2019Hypothesis Testing Interpretations and Renyi Differential Privacycited by 84
- 2021Membership Inference Attack on Graph Neural Networkscited by 81
- 2021LinkTeller: Recovering Private Edges from Graph Neural Networks via Influence Analysiscited by 65
- 2020Locally Private Graph Neural Networkscited by 64
5 more
- 2021GraphMI: Extracting Private Graph Data from Graph Neural Networkscited by 50
- 2022GAP: Differentially Private Graph Neural Networks with Aggregation Perturbationcited by 46
- 2021Node-Level Differentially Private Graph Neural Networkscited by 43
- 2021Privacy-Preserving Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 19
- 2022SoK: Differential Privacy on Graph-Structured Datacited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2023Just One Byte (per gradient): A Note on Low-Bandwidth Decentralized Language Model Finetuning Using Shared Randomnesscited by 18
- 2023ProGAP: Progressive Graph Neural Networks with Differential Privacy Guaranteescited by 12
- 2024Edge Private Graph Neural Networks with Singular Value Perturbationcited by 1
- 2026Adversarial Attacks on Locally Private Graph Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Misclassification Rate and Privacy-Utility Trade-offs in Graph Convolutional Networks via Subsampling Stabilitycited by 0
- 2026Misclassification Rate and Privacy-Utility Trade-offs in Graph Convolutional Networks via Subsampling Stability3 May 2026
- 2026Adversarial Attacks on Locally Private Graph Neural Networks21 Mar 2026
- 2024Edge Private Graph Neural Networks with Singular Value Perturbation16 Mar 2024
- 2023Just One Byte (per gradient): A Note on Low-Bandwidth Decentralized Language Model Finetuning Using Shared Randomness16 Jun 2023
- 2023ProGAP: Progressive Graph Neural Networks with Differential Privacy Guarantees18 Apr 2023