Don't do it: Safer Reinforcement Learning With Rule-based Guidance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
During training, reinforcement learning systems interact with the world without considering the safety of their actions. When deployed into the real world, such systems can be dangerous and cause harm to their surroundings. Often, dangerous situations can be mitigated by defining a set of rules that the system should not violate under any conditions. For example, in robot navigation, one safety rule would be to avoid colliding with surrounding objects and people. In this work, we define safety rules in terms of the relationships between the agent and objects and use them to prevent reinforcement learning systems from performing potentially harmful actions. We propose a new safe epsilon-greedy algorithm that uses safety rules to override agents' actions if they are considered to be unsafe. In our experiments, we show that a safe epsilon-greedy policy significantly increases the safety of the agent during training, improves the learning efficiency resulting in much faster convergence, and achieves better performance than the base model.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2022.
Builds on
11 of 29 references.
References · 11
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
- 2018A Lyapunov-based Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 278
- 2022A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Theory and Applicationscited by 169
- 2019Unsupervised State Representation Learning in Ataricited by 144
- 2017Trial without Error: Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning via Human Interventioncited by 102
- 2018Safe Reinforcement Learning with Model Uncertainty Estimatescited by 70
- 2022Safe Reinforcement Learning by Imagining the Near Futurecited by 67
- 2016Safe Policy Improvement by Minimizing Robust Baseline Regretcited by 51
- 2014Safe Exploration of State and Action Spaces in Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
- 2017RAIL: Risk-Averse Imitation Learningcited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.