mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Piecewise-Velocity Model for Learning Continuous-time Dynamic Node Representations

arXiv 2212.12345 ↗First posted 23 Dec 2022cs.LG cs.SIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Networks have become indispensable and ubiquitous structures in many fields to model the interactions among different entities, such as friendship in social networks or protein interactions in biological graphs. A major challenge is to understand the structure and dynamics of these systems. Although networks evolve through time, most existing graph representation learning methods target only static networks. Whereas approaches have been developed for the modeling of dynamic networks, there is a lack of efficient continuous time dynamic graph representation learning methods that can provide accurate network characterization and visualization in low dimensions while explicitly accounting for prominent network characteristics such as homophily and transitivity. In this paper, we propose the Piecewise-Velocity Model (PiVeM) for the representation of continuous-time dynamic networks. It learns dynamic embeddings in which the temporal evolution of nodes is approximated by piecewise linear interpolations based on a latent distance model with piecewise constant node-specific velocities. The model allows for analytically tractable expressions of the associated Poisson process likelihood with scalable inference invariant to the number of events. We further impose a scalable Kronecker structured Gaussian Process prior to the dynamics accounting for community structure, temporal smoothness, and disentangled (uncorrelated) latent embedding dimensions optimally learned to characterize the network dynamics. We show that PiVeM can successfully represent network structure and dynamics in ultra-low two-dimensional spaces. It outperforms relevant state-of-art methods in downstream tasks such as link prediction. In summary, PiVeM enables easily interpretable dynamic network visualizations and characterizations that can further improve our understanding of the intrinsic dynamics of time-evolving networks.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2022.

Builds on

16 of 45 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  3. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
  4. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
  5. 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 674
  6. 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 521
  7. 2019Representation Learning for Dynamic Graphs: A Surveycited by 260
  8. 2016Motifs in Temporal Networkscited by 101
  9. 2019Temporal Network Embedding with Micro- and Macro-dynamicscited by 51
  10. 2021Dynamic Network Embedding Surveycited by 44
  11. 2020Latent Space Models for Dynamic Networkscited by 29
  12. 2017A Review of Dynamic Network Models with Latent Variablescited by 18
4 more
  1. 2017Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?cited by 12
  2. 2022A Hierarchical Block Distance Model for Ultra Low-Dimensional Graph Representationscited by 9
  3. 2015Locally Adaptive Dynamic Networkscited by 7
  4. 2022HM-LDM: A Hybrid-Membership Latent Distance Modelcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

10 papers.