Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Technological advances have led to a strong increase in the number of data collection efforts aimed at measuring co-presence of individuals at different spatial resolutions. It is however unclear how much co-presence data can inform us on actual face-to-face contacts, of particular interest to study the structure of a population in social groups or for use in data-driven models of information or epidemic spreading processes. Here, we address this issue by leveraging data sets containing high resolution face-to-face contacts as well as a coarser spatial localisation of individuals, both temporally resolved, in various contexts. The co-presence and the face-to-face contact temporal networks share a number of structural and statistical features, but the former is (by definition) much denser than the latter. We thus consider several down-sampling methods that generate surrogate contact networks from the co-presence signal and compare them with the real face-to-face data. We show that these surrogate networks reproduce some features of the real data but are only partially able to identify the most central nodes of the face-to-face network. We then address the issue of using such down-sampled co-presence data in data-driven simulations of epidemic processes, and in identifying efficient containment strategies. We show that the performance of the various sampling methods strongly varies depending on context. We discuss the consequences of our results with respect to data collection strategies and methodologies.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 4.
12 papers.
- 2022Piecewise-Velocity Model for Learning Continuous-time Dynamic Node Representationscited by 10
- 2023Structure and inference in hypergraphs with node attributescited by 7
- 2022Learning Graph Structure from Convolutional Mixturescited by 5
- 2021A Bayesian generative neural network framework for epidemic inference problemscited by 4
- 2023Using Time-Aware Graph Neural Networks to Predict Temporal Centralities in Dynamic Graphscited by 4
- 2024An embedding-based distance for temporal graphscited by 3
- 2025Weisfeiler and Leman Follow the Arrow of Time: Expressive Power of Message Passing in Temporal Event Graphscited by 2
- 2021Overcoming Bias in Community Detection Evaluationcited by 0
- 2022pyGSL: A Graph Structure Learning Toolkitcited by 0
- 2025The Spectral Barycentre of a Set of Graphs with Community Structurecited by 0
- 2025CLGNN: A Contrastive Learning-based GNN Model for Betweenness Centrality Prediction on Temporal Graphscited by 0
- 2025Learning Multi-Order Block Structure in Higher-Order Networkscited by 0
- 2025Learning Multi-Order Block Structure in Higher-Order Networks26 Nov 2025
- 2025CLGNN: A Contrastive Learning-based GNN Model for Betweenness Centrality Prediction on Temporal Graphs17 Jun 2025
- 2025Weisfeiler and Leman Follow the Arrow of Time: Expressive Power of Message Passing in Temporal Event Graphs30 May 2025
- 2025The Spectral Barycentre of a Set of Graphs with Community Structure26 Jan 2025
- 2024An embedding-based distance for temporal graphs23 Jan 2024
- 2023Structure and inference in hypergraphs with node attributes7 Nov 2023
- 2023Using Time-Aware Graph Neural Networks to Predict Temporal Centralities in Dynamic Graphs24 Oct 2023
- 2022Piecewise-Velocity Model for Learning Continuous-time Dynamic Node Representations23 Dec 2022
- 2022pyGSL: A Graph Structure Learning Toolkit7 Nov 2022
- 2022Learning Graph Structure from Convolutional Mixtures19 May 2022
- 2021A Bayesian generative neural network framework for epidemic inference problems5 Nov 2021
- 2021Overcoming Bias in Community Detection Evaluation6 Feb 2021