mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Time to Cite: Modeling Citation Networks using the Dynamic Impact Single-Event Embedding Model

arXiv 2403.00032 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2024cs.SI cs.AI cs.DLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding the structure and dynamics of scientific research, i.e., the science of science (SciSci), has become an important area of research in order to address imminent questions including how scholars interact to advance science, how disciplines are related and evolve, and how research impact can be quantified and predicted. Central to the study of SciSci has been the analysis of citation networks. Here, two prominent modeling methodologies have been employed: one is to assess the citation impact dynamics of papers using parametric distributions, and the other is to embed the citation networks in a latent space optimal for characterizing the static relations between papers in terms of their citations. Interestingly, citation networks are a prominent example of single-event dynamic networks, i.e., networks for which each dyad only has a single event (i.e., the point in time of citation). We presently propose a novel likelihood function for the characterization of such single-event networks. Using this likelihood, we propose the Dynamic Impact Single-Event Embedding model (DISEE). The textscmodelabbrev model characterizes the scientific interactions in terms of a latent distance model in which random effects account for citation heterogeneity while the time-varying impact is characterized using existing parametric representations for assessment of dynamic impact. We highlight the proposed approach on several real citation networks finding that the DISEE well reconciles static latent distance network embedding approaches with classical dynamic impact assessments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2024.

Builds on

31 of 99 references.

References · 31

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  4. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  5. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
  6. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
  7. 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 674
  8. 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 521
  9. 2018Learning Continuous Hierarchies in the Lorentz Model of Hyperbolic Geometrycited by 261
  10. 2019Representation Learning for Dynamic Graphs: A Surveycited by 260
  11. 2017Network Embedding as Matrix Factorization: Unifying DeepWalk, LINE, PTE, and node2veccited by 197
  12. 2013From Amateurs to Connoisseurs: Modeling the Evolution of User Expertise through Online Reviewscited by 107
19 more
  1. 2021Is Heterophily A Real Nightmare For Graph Neural Networks To Do Node Classification?cited by 82
  2. 2018VERSE: Versatile Graph Embeddings from Similarity Measurescited by 54
  3. 2019NetSMF: Large-Scale Network Embedding as Sparse Matrix Factorizationcited by 48
  4. 2021Dynamic Network Embedding Surveycited by 44
  5. 2020Latent Space Models for Dynamic Networkscited by 29
  6. 2013Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impactcited by 28
  7. 2013Tradition and Innovation in Scientists' Research Strategiescited by 26
  8. 2014Modeling and Predicting Popularity Dynamics via Reinforced Poisson Processescited by 20
  9. 2017A Review of Dynamic Network Models with Latent Variablescited by 18
  10. 2015A review of the literature on citation impact indicatorscited by 14
  11. 2022Piecewise-Velocity Model for Learning Continuous-time Dynamic Node Representationscited by 10
  12. 2022A Hierarchical Block Distance Model for Ultra Low-Dimensional Graph Representationscited by 9
  13. 2014Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900cited by 8
  14. 2014Principles of scientific research team formation and evolutioncited by 7
  15. 2015Locally Adaptive Dynamic Networkscited by 7
  16. 2022HM-LDM: A Hybrid-Membership Latent Distance Modelcited by 6
  17. 2023Continuous-time Graph Representation with Sequential Survival Processcited by 4
  18. 2014Comment on "Quantifying Long-term Scientific Impact"cited by 3
  19. 2017Large Teams Have Developed Science and Technology; Small Teams Have Disrupted Itcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.