Multi-embodiment Legged Robot Control as a Sequence Modeling Problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Robots are traditionally bounded by a fixed embodiment during their operational lifetime, which limits their ability to adapt to their surroundings. Co-optimizing control and morphology of a robot, however, is often inefficient due to the complex interplay between the controller and morphology. In this paper, we propose a learning-based control method that can inherently take morphology into consideration such that once the control policy is trained in the simulator, it can be easily deployed to robots with different embodiments in the real world. In particular, we present the Embodiment-aware Transformer (EAT), an architecture that casts this control problem as conditional sequence modeling. EAT outputs the optimal actions by leveraging a causally masked Transformer. By conditioning an autoregressive model on the desired robot embodiment, past states, and actions, our EAT model can generate future actions that best fit the current robot embodiment. Experimental results show that EAT can outperform all other alternatives in embodiment-varying tasks, and succeed in an example of real-world evolution tasks: stepping down a stair through updating the morphology alone. We hope that EAT will inspire a new push toward real-world evolution across many domains, where algorithms like EAT can blaze a trail by bridging the field of evolutionary robotics and big data sequence modeling.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2024Cross-Embodiment Dexterous Grasping with Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Cross-Domain Policy Transfer for Embodied Agentscited by 16
- 2025OXE-AugE: A Large-Scale Robot Augmentation of OXE for Scaling Cross-Embodiment Policy Learningcited by 10
- 2024PEAC: Unsupervised Pre-training for Cross-Embodiment Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
- 2023Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Applications, Visionary Prospects, and Challengescited by 5
- 2025Beyond Topology: A Morphological Symmetry Graph Representation for Locomotion Policy Learningcited by 4
- 2024Fourier Controller Networks for Real-Time Decision-Making in Embodied Learningcited by 3
- 2023Adaptive Control Strategy for Quadruped Robots in Actuator Degradation Scenarioscited by 2
- 2026Shape Your Body: Value Gradients for Multi-Embodiment Robot Designcited by 2
- 2024MetaLoco: Universal Quadrupedal Locomotion with Meta-Reinforcement Learning and Motion Imitationcited by 1
- 2026RobotDesignGPT: Automated Robot Design Synthesis using Vision Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Shape Your Body: Value Gradients for Multi-Embodiment Robot Design30 May 2026
- 2026RobotDesignGPT: Automated Robot Design Synthesis using Vision Language Models16 Jan 2026
- 2025OXE-AugE: A Large-Scale Robot Augmentation of OXE for Scaling Cross-Embodiment Policy Learning15 Dec 2025
- 2025Beyond Topology: A Morphological Symmetry Graph Representation for Locomotion Policy Learning30 Nov 2025
- 2024Cross-Embodiment Dexterous Grasping with Reinforcement Learning3 Oct 2024
- 2024MetaLoco: Universal Quadrupedal Locomotion with Meta-Reinforcement Learning and Motion Imitation5 Jul 2024
- 2024Fourier Controller Networks for Real-Time Decision-Making in Embodied Learning30 May 2024
- 2024PEAC: Unsupervised Pre-training for Cross-Embodiment Reinforcement Learning23 May 2024
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Cross-Domain Policy Transfer for Embodied Agents7 Feb 2024
- 2023Adaptive Control Strategy for Quadruped Robots in Actuator Degradation Scenarios29 Dec 2023
- 2023Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Applications, Visionary Prospects, and Challenges17 May 2023