Thales: Formulating and Estimating Architectural Vulnerability Factors for DNN Accelerators
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are increasingly deployed in safety critical and privacy sensitive applications such as autonomous driving and biometric authentication, it is critical to understand the fault-tolerance nature of DNNs. Prior work primarily focuses on metrics such as Failures In Time (FIT) rate and the Silent Data Corruption (SDC) rate, which quantify how often a device fails. Instead, this paper focuses on quantifying the DNN accuracy given that a transient error has occurred, which tells us how well a network behaves when a transient error occurs. We call this metric Resiliency Accuracy (RA). We show that existing RA formulation is fundamentally inaccurate, because it incorrectly assumes that software variables (model weights/activations) have equal faulty probability under hardware transient faults. We present an algorithm that captures the faulty probabilities of DNN variables under transient faults and, thus, provides correct RA estimations validated by hardware. To accelerate RA estimation, we reformulate RA calculation as a Monte Carlo integration problem, and solve it using importance sampling driven by DNN specific heuristics. Using our lightweight RA estimation method, we show that transient faults lead to far greater accuracy degradation than what todays DNN resiliency tools estimate. We show how our RA estimation tool can help design more resilient DNNs by integrating it with a Network Architecture Search framework.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2022.
Builds on
24 of 89 references.
References · 24
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
- 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
- 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
- 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 994
- 2016NTU RGB+D: A Large Scale Dataset for 3D Human Activity Analysiscited by 683
- 2014Deep Speech: Scaling up end-to-end speech recognitioncited by 354
- 2019TBT: Targeted Neural Network Attack with Bit Trojancited by 112
12 more
- 2018Co-occurrence Feature Learning from Skeleton Data for Action Recognition and Detection with Hierarchical Aggregationcited by 106
- 2019MFAS: Multimodal Fusion Architecture Searchcited by 84
- 2019Terminal Brain Damage: Exposing the Graceless Degradation in Deep Neural Networks Under Hardware Fault Attackscited by 55
- 2018Glimpse Clouds: Human Activity Recognition from Unstructured Feature Pointscited by 33
- 2019Adversarial Defense Through Network Profiling Based Path Extractioncited by 22
- 2020TensorFI: A Flexible Fault Injection Framework for TensorFlow Applicationscited by 21
- 2015Taking a Deeper Look at Pedestrianscited by 15
- 2020Ptolemy: Architecture Support for Robust Deep Learningcited by 12
- 2022Crescent: Taming Memory Irregularities for Accelerating Deep Point Cloud Analyticscited by 8
- 2019Tigris: Architecture and Algorithms for 3D Perception in Point Cloudscited by 5
- 2022RTNN: Accelerating Neighbor Search Using Hardware Ray Tracingcited by 4
- 2016CLEAR: Cross-Layer Exploration for Architecting Resilience - Combining Hardware and Software Techniques to Tolerate Soft Errors in Processor Corescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.