Gradient-Based Geometry Learning for Fan-Beam CT Reconstruction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Incorporating computed tomography (CT) reconstruction operators into differentiable pipelines has proven beneficial in many applications. Such approaches usually focus on the projection data and keep the acquisition geometry fixed. However, precise knowledge of the acquisition geometry is essential for high quality reconstruction results. In this paper, the differentiable formulation of fan-beam CT reconstruction is extended to the acquisition geometry. This allows to propagate gradient information from a loss function on the reconstructed image into the geometry parameters. As a proof-of-concept experiment, this idea is applied to rigid motion compensation. The cost function is parameterized by a trained neural network which regresses an image quality metric from the motion affected reconstruction alone. Using the proposed method, we are the first to optimize such an autofocus-inspired algorithm based on analytical gradients. The algorithm achieves a reduction in MSE by 35.5 % and an improvement in SSIM by 12.6 % over the motion affected reconstruction. Next to motion compensation, we see further use cases of our differentiable method for scanner calibration or hybrid techniques employing deep models.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2022.
Builds on
8 of 39 references.
References · 8
- 2020TorchRadon: Fast Differentiable Routines for Computed Tomographycited by 44
- 2019PYRO-NN: Python Reconstruction Operators in Neural Networkscited by 24
- 2020Generalizing Spatial Transformers to Projective Geometry with Applications to 2D/3D Registrationcited by 21
- 2022Near-Exact Recovery for Tomographic Inverse Problems via Deep Learningcited by 13
- 2022NeAT: Neural Adaptive Tomographycited by 11
- 2022Ultra Low-Parameter Denoising: Trainable Bilateral Filter Layers in Computed Tomographycited by 9
- 2022On the Benefit of Dual-domain Denoising in a Self-supervised Low-dose CT Settingcited by 9
- 2020Appearance Learning for Image-based Motion Estimation in Tomographycited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2024A gradient-based approach to fast and accurate head motion compensation in cone-beam CTcited by 5
- 2023Optimizing CT Scan Geometries With and Without Gradientscited by 1
- 2024Segmentation-Guided Knee Radiograph Generation using Conditional Diffusion Modelscited by 1
- 2024Differentiable Score-Based Likelihoods: Learning CT Motion Compensation From Clean Imagescited by 1
- 2023Exploring Epipolar Consistency Conditions for Rigid Motion Compensation in In-vivo X-ray Microscopycited by 0
- 2024On the Influence of Smoothness Constraints in Computed Tomography Motion Compensationcited by 0
- 2026Revisiting Pose Sensitivity in Splat-based Computed Tomography under Sparse-view Reconstructioncited by 0
- 2026Differentiable Jitter Correction using Deep Learning-based Image Quality Metric for Phase-Contrast Micro-CTcited by 0
- 2026Differentiable Jitter Correction using Deep Learning-based Image Quality Metric for Phase-Contrast Micro-CT27 Aug 2026
- 2026Revisiting Pose Sensitivity in Splat-based Computed Tomography under Sparse-view Reconstruction5 Aug 2026
- 2024On the Influence of Smoothness Constraints in Computed Tomography Motion Compensation29 May 2024
- 2024Differentiable Score-Based Likelihoods: Learning CT Motion Compensation From Clean Images23 Apr 2024
- 2024Segmentation-Guided Knee Radiograph Generation using Conditional Diffusion Models4 Apr 2024
- 2024A gradient-based approach to fast and accurate head motion compensation in cone-beam CT17 Jan 2024
- 2023Exploring Epipolar Consistency Conditions for Rigid Motion Compensation in In-vivo X-ray Microscopy1 Mar 2023
- 2023Optimizing CT Scan Geometries With and Without Gradients13 Feb 2023