mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimizing CT Scan Geometries With and Without Gradients

arXiv 2302.06251 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2023eess.IV cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In computed tomography (CT), the projection geometry used for data acquisition needs to be known precisely to obtain a clear reconstructed image. Rigid patient motion is a cause for misalignment between measured data and employed geometry. Commonly, such motion is compensated by solving an optimization problem that, e.g., maximizes the quality of the reconstructed image with respect to the projection geometry. So far, gradient-free optimization algorithms have been utilized to find the solution for this problem. Here, we show that gradient-based optimization algorithms are a possible alternative and compare the performance to their gradient-free counterparts on a benchmark motion compensation problem. Gradient-based algorithms converge substantially faster while being comparable to gradient-free algorithms in terms of capture range and robustness to the number of free parameters. Hence, gradient-based optimization is a viable alternative for the given type of problems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2023.

Builds on

3 of 8 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019PYRO-NN: Python Reconstruction Operators in Neural Networkscited by 24
  2. 2022Gradient-Based Geometry Learning for Fan-Beam CT Reconstructioncited by 8
  3. 2020Appearance Learning for Image-based Motion Estimation in Tomographycited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.