mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Using Gradient to Boost the Generalization Performance of Deep Learning Models for Fluid Dynamics

arXiv 2212.00716 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2022physics.flu-dyn cs.LG cs.NAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Nowadays, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is a fundamental tool for industrial design. However, the computational cost of doing such simulations is expensive and can be detrimental for real-world use cases where many simulations are necessary, such as the task of shape optimization. Recently, Deep Learning (DL) has achieved a significant leap in a wide spectrum of applications and became a good candidate for physical systems, opening perspectives to CFD. To circumvent the computational bottleneck of CFD, DL models have been used to learn on Euclidean data, and more recently, on non-Euclidean data such as unstuctured grids and manifolds, allowing much faster and more efficient (memory, hardware) surrogate models. Nevertheless, DL presents the intrinsic limitation of extrapolating (generalizing) out of training data distribution (design space). In this study, we present a novel work to increase the generalization capabilities of Deep Learning. To do so, we incorporate the physical gradients (derivatives of the outputs w.r.t. the inputs) to the DL models. Our strategy has shown good results towards a better generalization of DL networks and our methodological/ theoretical study is corroborated with empirical validation, including an ablation study.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2022.

Builds on

20 of 56 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  3. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  4. 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,401
  5. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
  6. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,238
  7. 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,200
  8. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,576
  9. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
  10. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,070
  11. 2020Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networkscited by 880
  12. 2017Self-Normalizing Neural Networkscited by 598
8 more
  1. 2020Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solverscited by 205
  2. 20203D Object Detection with Pointformercited by 194
  3. 2018Deep Learning Methods for Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations of Airfoil Flowscited by 150
  4. 2021Bayesian Optimization is Superior to Random Search for Machine Learning Hyperparameter Tuning: Analysis of the Black-Box Optimization Challenge 2020cited by 148
  5. 2021Modulated Periodic Activations for Generalizable Local Functional Representationscited by 140
  6. 2017A Tutorial on Kernel Density Estimation and Recent Advancescited by 101
  7. 2022Predicting Physics in Mesh-reduced Space with Temporal Attentioncited by 84
  8. 2021Attention Models for Point Clouds in Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.