mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimizing Explanations by Network Canonization and Hyperparameter Search

arXiv 2211.17174 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable AI (XAI) is slowly becoming a key component for many AI applications. Rule-based and modified backpropagation XAI approaches however often face challenges when being applied to modern model architectures including innovative layer building blocks, which is caused by two reasons. Firstly, the high flexibility of rule-based XAI methods leads to numerous potential parameterizations. Secondly, many XAI methods break the implementation-invariance axiom because they struggle with certain model components, e.g., BatchNorm layers. The latter can be addressed with model canonization, which is the process of re-structuring the model to disregard problematic components without changing the underlying function. While model canonization is straightforward for simple architectures (e.g., VGG, ResNet), it can be challenging for more complex and highly interconnected models (e.g., DenseNet). Moreover, there is only little quantifiable evidence that model canonization is beneficial for XAI. In this work, we propose canonizations for currently relevant model blocks applicable to popular deep neural network architectures,including VGG, ResNet, EfficientNet, DenseNets, as well as Relation Networks. We further suggest a XAI evaluation framework with which we quantify and compare the effect sof model canonization for various XAI methods in image classification tasks on the Pascal-VOC and ILSVRC2017 datasets, as well as for Visual Question Answering using CLEVR-XAI. Moreover, addressing the former issue outlined above, we demonstrate how our evaluation framework can be applied to perform hyperparameter search for XAI methods to optimize the quality of explanations.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2022.

Builds on

36 of 52 references.

References · 36

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  6. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  7. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  8. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  9. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  10. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  11. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  12. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
24 more
  1. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  2. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  3. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  4. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  5. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  6. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  7. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
  8. 2017A simple neural network module for relational reasoningcited by 345
  9. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
  10. 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 342
  11. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
  12. 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 309
  13. 2022Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyondcited by 171
  14. 2020Ground Truth Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations with CLEVR-XAIcited by 125
  15. 2022OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanationscited by 125
  16. 2019When Explanations Lie: Why Many Modified BP Attributions Failcited by 92
  17. 2019Towards Best Practice in Explaining Neural Network Decisions with LRPcited by 70
  18. 2016"What is Relevant in a Text Document?": An Interpretable Machine Learning Approachcited by 53
  19. 2021Software for Dataset-wide XAI: From Local Explanations to Global Insights with Zennit, CoRelAy, and ViRelAycited by 53
  20. 2022Beyond Explaining: Opportunities and Challenges of XAI-Based Model Improvementcited by 48
  21. 2022Shortcomings of Top-Down Randomization-Based Sanity Checks for Evaluations of Deep Neural Network Explanationscited by 22
  22. 2020Breaking Batch Normalization for better explainability of Deep Neural Networks through Layer-wise Relevance Propagationcited by 11
  23. 2019Bayesian Optimization using Pseudo-Pointscited by 7
  24. 2022Measurably Stronger Explanation Reliability via Model Canonizationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

11 papers.