Uncovering the Structure of Explanation Quality with Spectral Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As machine learning models are increasingly considered for high-stakes domains, effective explanation methods are crucial to ensure that their prediction strategies are transparent to the user. Over the years, numerous metrics have been proposed to assess quality of explanations. However, their practical applicability remains unclear, in particular due to a limited understanding of which specific aspects each metric rewards. In this paper we propose a new framework based on spectral analysis of explanation outcomes to systematically capture the multifaceted properties of different explanation techniques. Our analysis uncovers two distinct factors of explanation quality-stability and target sensitivity-that can be directly observed through spectral decomposition. Experiments on both MNIST and ImageNet show that popular evaluation techniques (e.g., pixel-flipping, entropy) partially capture the trade-offs between these factors. Overall, our framework provides a foundational basis for understanding explanation quality, guiding the development of more reliable techniques for evaluating explanations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2025.
Builds on
24 of 48 references.
References · 24
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
- 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 419
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 365
- 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 321
- 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 302
- 2017Real Time Image Saliency for Black Box Classifierscited by 246
12 more
- 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 216
- 2022Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyondcited by 171
- 2017The Shattered Gradients Problem: If resnets are the answer, then what is the question?cited by 157
- 2020Higher-Order Explanations of Graph Neural Networks via Relevant Walkscited by 138
- 2019When Explanations Lie: Why Many Modified BP Attributions Failcited by 92
- 2024Decoupling Pixel Flipping and Occlusion Strategy for Consistent XAI Benchmarkscited by 28
- 2022Disentangled Explanations of Neural Network Predictions by Finding Relevant Subspacescited by 25
- 2022Shortcomings of Top-Down Randomization-Based Sanity Checks for Evaluations of Deep Neural Network Explanationscited by 22
- 2024xMIL: Insightful Explanations for Multiple Instance Learning in Histopathologycited by 16
- 2022Optimizing Explanations by Network Canonization and Hyperparameter Searchcited by 11
- 2024Towards Symbolic XAI -- Explanation Through Human Understandable Logical Relationships Between Featurescited by 7
- 2023An XAI framework for robust and transparent data-driven wind turbine power curve modelscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.