Meta-analysis of individualized treatment rules via sign-coherency
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Medical treatments tailored to a patient's baseline characteristics hold the potential of improving patient outcomes while reducing negative side effects. Learning individualized treatment rules (ITRs) often requires aggregation of multiple datasets(sites); however, current ITR methodology does not take between-site heterogeneity into account, which can hurt model generalizability when deploying back to each site. To address this problem, we develop a method for individual-level meta-analysis of ITRs, which jointly learns site-specific ITRs while borrowing information about feature sign-coherency via a scientifically-motivated directionality principle. We also develop an adaptive procedure for model tuning, using information criteria tailored to the ITR learning problem. We study the proposed methods through numerical experiments to understand their performance under different levels of between-site heterogeneity and apply the methodology to estimate ITRs in a large multi-center database of electronic health records. This work extends several popular methodologies for estimating ITRs (A-learning, weighted learning) to the multiple-sites setting.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2022.
Builds on
23 of 62 references.
References · 23
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,653
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,718
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 764
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 711
- 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 598
- 2020Attack of the Tails: Yes, You Really Can Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 308
- 2019Orthogonal Statistical Learningcited by 150
- 2021Nonparametric Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: From Theory to Learning Algorithmscited by 144
- 2017Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: Lessons learned from a data analysis competitioncited by 106
- 2017Double/Debiased/Neyman Machine Learning of Treatment Effectscited by 76
- 2018Confounding-Robust Policy Improvementcited by 73
- 2021Causal Decision Making and Causal Effect Estimation Are Not the Same... and Why It Matterscited by 25
11 more
- 2014On Communication Cost of Distributed Statistical Estimation and Dimensionalitycited by 24
- 2017Random Forest Missing Data Algorithmscited by 23
- 2019A semiparametric instrumental variable approach to optimal treatment regimes under endogeneitycited by 22
- 2021The Balancing Act in Causal Inferencecited by 20
- 2020Estimating Optimal Treatment Rules with an Instrumental Variable: A Partial Identification Learning Approachcited by 17
- 2021A Tree-based Model Averaging Approach for Personalized Treatment Effect Estimation from Heterogeneous Data Sourcescited by 14
- 2015Using Decision Lists to Construct Interpretable and Parsimonious Treatment Regimescited by 11
- 2020Energy Balancing of Covariate Distributionscited by 9
- 2020Selecting and ranking individualized treatment rules with unmeasured confoundingcited by 4
- 2019Balanced Policy Evaluation and Learning for Right Censored Datacited by 1
- 2021Preserving data privacy when using multi-site data to estimate individualized treatment rulescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.