mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explainable and Safe Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Air Mobility

arXiv 2211.13474 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.ROcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Increasing traffic demands, higher levels of automation, and communication enhancements provide novel design opportunities for future air traffic controllers (ATCs). This article presents a novel deep reinforcement learning (DRL) controller to aid conflict resolution for autonomous free flight. Although DRL has achieved important advancements in this field, the existing works pay little attention to the explainability and safety issues related to DRL controllers, particularly the safety under adversarial attacks. To address those two issues, we design a fully explainable DRL framework wherein we: 1) decompose the coupled Q value learning model into a safety-awareness and efficiency (reach the target) one; and 2) use information from surrounding intruders as inputs, eliminating the needs of central controllers. In our simulated experiments, we show that by decoupling the safety-awareness and efficiency, we can exceed performance on free flight control tasks while dramatically improving explainability on practical. In addition, the safety Q learning module provides rich information about the safety situation of environments. To study the safety under adversarial attacks, we additionally propose an adversarial attack strategy that can impose both safety-oriented and efficiency-oriented attacks. The adversarial aims to minimize safety/efficiency by only attacking the agent at a few time steps. In the experiments, our attack strategy increases as many collisions as the uniform attack (i.e., attacking at every time step) by only attacking the agent four times less often, which provide insights into the capabilities and restrictions of the DRL in future ATC designs. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/WLeiiiii/Gym-ATC-Attack-Project.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2022.

Builds on

19 of 59 references.

References · 19

  1. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  2. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  3. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  4. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  5. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
  6. 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 769
  7. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
  8. 2017Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policiescited by 314
  9. 2017Tactics of Adversarial Attack on Deep Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 163
  10. 2020What Matters In On-Policy Reinforcement Learning? A Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 157
  11. 2017Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Attackscited by 152
  12. 2017Delving into adversarial attacks on deep policiescited by 104
7 more
  1. 2017Vulnerability of Deep Reinforcement Learning to Policy Induction Attackscited by 91
  2. 2020Stealthy and Efficient Adversarial Attacks against Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 62
  3. 2017Whatever Does Not Kill Deep Reinforcement Learning, Makes It Strongercited by 35
  4. 2019Optimal Attacks on Reinforcement Learning Policiescited by 21
  5. 2020Enhanced Adversarial Strategically-Timed Attacks against Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  6. 2020A Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach to Autonomous Separation Assurancecited by 6
  7. 2020An Autonomous Free Airspace En-route Controller using Deep Reinforcement Learning Techniquescited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.