Relating Regularization and Generalization through the Intrinsic Dimension of Activations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given a pair of models with similar training set performance, it is natural to assume that the model that possesses simpler internal representations would exhibit better generalization. In this work, we provide empirical evidence for this intuition through an analysis of the intrinsic dimension (ID) of model activations, which can be thought of as the minimal number of factors of variation in the model's representation of the data. First, we show that common regularization techniques uniformly decrease the last-layer ID (LLID) of validation set activations for image classification models and show how this strongly affects generalization performance. We also investigate how excessive regularization decreases a model's ability to extract features from data in earlier layers, leading to a negative effect on validation accuracy even while LLID continues to decrease and training accuracy remains near-perfect. Finally, we examine the LLID over the course of training of models that exhibit grokking. We observe that well after training accuracy saturates, when models ``grok'' and validation accuracy suddenly improves from random to perfect, there is a co-occurent sudden drop in LLID, thus providing more insight into the dynamics of sudden generalization.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2022.
Builds on
25 of 41 references.
References · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 915
- 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 599
- 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 307
- 2019Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networkscited by 276
- 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 246
- 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
- 2017Regularization for Deep Learning: A Taxonomycited by 91
- 2018The Description Length of Deep Learning Modelscited by 71
13 more
- 2021Intrinsic Dimension, Persistent Homology and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 70
- 2018A Topological Regularizer for Classifiers via Persistent Homologycited by 62
- 2019Dimensionality compression and expansion in Deep Neural Networkscited by 38
- 2022Why neural networks find simple solutions: the many regularizers of geometric complexitycited by 38
- 2022LIDL: Local Intrinsic Dimension Estimation Using Approximate Likelihoodcited by 30
- 2017LDMNet: Low Dimensional Manifold Regularized Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2021Intrinsic Dimension Estimation Using Wasserstein Distancescited by 20
- 2019Geometry-Aware Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 15
- 2016Degrees of Freedom in Deep Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2021Tangent Space and Dimension Estimation with the Wasserstein Distancecited by 10
- 2021Unsupervised Embedding Adaptation via Early-Stage Feature Reconstruction for Few-Shot Classificationcited by 7
- 2019CoopSubNet: Cooperating Subnetwork for Data-Driven Regularization of Deep Networks under Limited Training Budgetscited by 1
- 2021The Foes of Neural Network's Data Efficiency Among Unnecessary Input Dimensionscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
9 papers.
- 2024A Geometric View of Data Complexity: Efficient Local Intrinsic Dimension Estimation with Diffusion Modelscited by 41
- 2024Deep Regression Representation Learning with Topologycited by 4
- 2024Intrinsic Dimension Correlation: uncovering nonlinear connections in multimodal representationscited by 4
- 2025On Convolutions, Intrinsic Dimension, and Diffusion Modelscited by 2
- 2026Topological Signatures of Grokkingcited by 2
- 2026At-Grok Is Not Converged:A Measurement-Validity Audit for Grokking Representation Metricscited by 1
- 2025HomID : Benchmarking Intrinsic Dimension Estimators on Homogenous Manifolds with Anisotropic Embeddingscited by 0
- 2025Logit-Based Losses Limit the Effectiveness of Feature Knowledge Distillationcited by 0
- 2026Higher Structures in Deep Learningcited by 0
- 2026Higher Structures in Deep Learning31 Aug 2026
- 2026At-Grok Is Not Converged:A Measurement-Validity Audit for Grokking Representation Metrics7 Jul 2026
- 2026Topological Signatures of Grokking7 May 2026
- 2025Logit-Based Losses Limit the Effectiveness of Feature Knowledge Distillation18 Nov 2025
- 2025HomID : Benchmarking Intrinsic Dimension Estimators on Homogenous Manifolds with Anisotropic Embeddings1 Oct 2025
- 2025On Convolutions, Intrinsic Dimension, and Diffusion Models25 Jun 2025
- 2024Intrinsic Dimension Correlation: uncovering nonlinear connections in multimodal representations22 Jun 2024
- 2024A Geometric View of Data Complexity: Efficient Local Intrinsic Dimension Estimation with Diffusion Models5 Jun 2024
- 2024Deep Regression Representation Learning with Topology22 Apr 2024