mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HomID : Benchmarking Intrinsic Dimension Estimators on Homogenous Manifolds with Anisotropic Embeddings

arXiv 2510.01335 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2025cs.LG cond-mat.dis-nn math.MGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The manifold hypothesis suggests that data lies on manifolds with smaller intrinsic dimension (ID) than their ambient dimension. However there is no empirical agreement on the estimates for ID from different estimators for realistic datasets. Thus it is important to test ID estimators (IDEs) with targeted stressors. In this work, we consider the role of anisotropy. To this end, we propose HomID, a collection of homogeneous spaces with anisotropic embedding, for benchmarking ID estimators. We observe that methods that perform well on standard benchmarks systematically degrade on HomID under identical resource allocation. We further observe that anisotropic distortion of such benchmarks also results in performance degradation. Finally, we demonstrate that controlled anisotropic distortions induce systematic shifts in the distributions on which these methods rely, providing a concrete mechanism for the resulting estimation errors in two particular IDEs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

Builds on

19 of 76 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
  2. 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 307
  3. 2019Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networkscited by 276
  4. 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 246
  5. 2021Intrinsic Dimension, Persistent Homology and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 70
  6. 2021Scikit-dimension: a Python package for intrinsic dimension estimationcited by 68
  7. 2022Verifying the Union of Manifolds Hypothesis for Image Datacited by 62
  8. 2018Blessing of dimensionality: mathematical foundations of the statistical physics of datacited by 55
  9. 2021IsoScore: Measuring the Uniformity of Embedding Space Utilizationcited by 52
  10. 2024A Geometric View of Data Complexity: Efficient Local Intrinsic Dimension Estimation with Diffusion Modelscited by 41
  11. 2023Topological Deep Learning: A Review of an Emerging Paradigmcited by 34
  12. 2022LIDL: Local Intrinsic Dimension Estimation Using Approximate Likelihoodcited by 30
7 more
  1. 2021Intrinsic Dimension Estimation Using Wasserstein Distancescited by 20
  2. 2023Learning Manifold Dimensions with Conditional Variational Autoencoderscited by 20
  3. 2018Grassmannian Learning: Embedding Geometry Awareness in Shallow and Deep Learningcited by 19
  4. 2024Hardness of Learning Neural Networks under the Manifold Hypothesiscited by 18
  5. 2019Geometry-Aware Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 15
  6. 2022Relating Regularization and Generalization through the Intrinsic Dimension of Activationscited by 9
  7. 2024Robust estimation of the intrinsic dimension of data sets with quantum cognition machine learningcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.