Decision-making with Speculative Opponent Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Opponent modelling has proven effective in enhancing the decision-making of the controlled agent by constructing models of opponent agents. However, existing methods often rely on access to the observations and actions of opponents, a requirement that is infeasible when such information is either unobservable or challenging to obtain. To address this issue, we introduce Distributional Opponent-aided Multi-agent Actor-Critic (DOMAC), the first speculative opponent modelling algorithm that relies solely on local information (i.e., the controlled agent's observations, actions, and rewards). Specifically, the actor maintains a speculated belief about the opponents using the tailored speculative opponent models that predict the opponents' actions using only local information. Moreover, DOMAC features distributional critic models that estimate the return distribution of the actor's policy, yielding a more fine-grained assessment of the actor's quality. This thus more effectively guides the training of the speculative opponent models that the actor depends upon. Furthermore, we formally derive a policy gradient theorem with the proposed opponent models. Extensive experiments under eight different challenging multi-agent benchmark tasks within the MPE, Pommerman and StarCraft Multiagent Challenge (SMAC) demonstrate that our DOMAC successfully models opponents' behaviours and delivers superior performance against state-of-the-art methods with a faster convergence speed.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2022.
Builds on
45 of 79 references.
References · 45
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
- 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
- 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
- 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
- 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 555
- 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 490
- 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 464
33 more
- 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
- 2018Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 362
- 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 267
- 2018Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 259
- 2018Machine Theory of Mindcited by 222
- 2017Learning with Opponent-Learning Awarenesscited by 218
- 2020Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Taskscited by 207
- 2018Distributed Distributional Deterministic Policy Gradientscited by 195
- 2018A Survey and Critique of Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 173
- 2017Autonomous Agents Modelling Other Agents: A Comprehensive Survey and Open Problemscited by 126
- 2020RODE: Learning Roles to Decompose Multi-Agent Taskscited by 125
- 2019Deep Coordination Graphscited by 96
- 2016Opponent Modeling in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 94
- 2019Probabilistic Recursive Reasoning for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
- 2018Modeling Others using Oneself in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 64
- 2020Agent Modelling under Partial Observability for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 56
- 2018Learning Policy Representations in Multiagent Systemscited by 48
- 2020A Policy Gradient Algorithm for Learning to Learn in Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
- 2020A Review of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Smart Building Energy Managementcited by 35
- 2018Pommerman: A Multi-Agent Playgroundcited by 30
- 2021Deep Interactive Bayesian Reinforcement Learning via Meta-Learningcited by 29
- 2018Multiagent Soft Q-Learningcited by 26
- 2021DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-Learningcited by 26
- 2017A Deep Policy Inference Q-Network for Multi-Agent Systemscited by 24
- 2019Modelling Bounded Rationality in Multi-Agent Interactions by Generalized Recursive Reasoningcited by 24
- 2019Reasoning about Hypothetical Agent Behaviours and their Parameterscited by 24
- 2019Distributional Policy Optimization: An Alternative Approach for Continuous Controlcited by 21
- 2020Implicit Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2020Multi-Agent Interactions Modeling with Correlated Policiescited by 13
- 2020Sample-based Distributional Policy Gradientcited by 12
- 2019A Regularized Opponent Model with Maximum Entropy Objectivecited by 10
- 2022Distributional Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equations for Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
- 2020QR-MIX: Distributional Value Function Factorisation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.