Explaining Random Forests using Bipolar Argumentation and Markov Networks (Technical Report)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Random forests are decision tree ensembles that can be used to solve a variety of machine learning problems. However, as the number of trees and their individual size can be large, their decision making process is often incomprehensible. In order to reason about the decision process, we propose representing it as an argumentation problem. We generalize sufficient and necessary argumentative explanations using a Markov network encoding, discuss the relevance of these explanations and establish relationships to families of abductive explanations from the literature. As the complexity of the explanation problems is high, we discuss a probabilistic approximation algorithm and present first experimental results.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2022.
Builds on
8 of 36 references.
References · 8
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2018A Symbolic Approach to Explaining Bayesian Network Classifierscited by 131
- 2018Model Agnostic Supervised Local Explanationscited by 83
- 2021Argumentative XAI: A Surveycited by 67
- 2021On Explaining Random Forests with SATcited by 57
- 2019Measurable Counterfactual Local Explanations for Any Classifiercited by 48
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 4.
9 papers.
- 2023Recourse under Model Multiplicity via Argumentative Ensembling (Technical Report)cited by 15
- 2024Contribution Functions for Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Graphs: A Principle-based Analysiscited by 11
- 2024Explaining Arguments' Strength: Unveiling the Role of Attacks and Supports (Technical Report)cited by 3
- 2025Latent Debate: A Surrogate Framework for Interpreting LLM Thinkingcited by 3
- 2025Set Contribution Functions for Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation and their Principlescited by 2
- 2024Applying Attribution Explanations in Truth-Discovery Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworkscited by 1
- 2024Argumentation and Machine Learningcited by 1
- 2025Surrogate Interpretable Graph for Random Decision Forestscited by 1
- 2025Argumentative Ensembling for Robust Recourse under Model Multiplicitycited by 1
- 2025Latent Debate: A Surrogate Framework for Interpreting LLM Thinking1 Dec 2025
- 2025Set Contribution Functions for Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation and their Principles18 Sep 2025
- 2025Argumentative Ensembling for Robust Recourse under Model Multiplicity25 Jun 2025
- 2025Surrogate Interpretable Graph for Random Decision Forests17 May 2025
- 2024Argumentation and Machine Learning31 Oct 2024
- 2024Applying Attribution Explanations in Truth-Discovery Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks9 Sep 2024
- 2024Explaining Arguments' Strength: Unveiling the Role of Attacks and Supports (Technical Report)22 Apr 2024
- 2024Contribution Functions for Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Graphs: A Principle-based Analysis16 Jan 2024
- 2023Recourse under Model Multiplicity via Argumentative Ensembling (Technical Report)22 Dec 2023