mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explaining Random Forests using Bipolar Argumentation and Markov Networks (Technical Report)

arXiv 2211.11699 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2022cs.AI cs.LG cs.LOcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Random forests are decision tree ensembles that can be used to solve a variety of machine learning problems. However, as the number of trees and their individual size can be large, their decision making process is often incomprehensible. In order to reason about the decision process, we propose representing it as an argumentation problem. We generalize sufficient and necessary argumentative explanations using a Markov network encoding, discuss the relevance of these explanations and establish relationships to families of abductive explanations from the literature. As the complexity of the explanation problems is high, we discuss a probabilistic approximation algorithm and present first experimental results.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2022.

Builds on

8 of 36 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  4. 2018A Symbolic Approach to Explaining Bayesian Network Classifierscited by 131
  5. 2018Model Agnostic Supervised Local Explanationscited by 83
  6. 2021Argumentative XAI: A Surveycited by 67
  7. 2021On Explaining Random Forests with SATcited by 57
  8. 2019Measurable Counterfactual Local Explanations for Any Classifiercited by 48

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 4.

9 papers.