mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Normalizing Flow with Variational Latent Representation

arXiv 2211.11638 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Normalizing flow (NF) has gained popularity over traditional maximum likelihood based methods due to its strong capability to model complex data distributions. However, the standard approach, which maps the observed data to a normal distribution, has difficulty in handling data distributions with multiple relatively isolated modes. To overcome this issue, we propose a new framework based on variational latent representation to improve the practical performance of NF. The idea is to replace the standard normal latent variable with a more general latent representation, jointly learned via Variational Bayes. For example, by taking the latent representation as a discrete sequence, our framework can learn a Transformer model that generates the latent sequence and an NF model that generates continuous data distribution conditioned on the sequence. The resulting method is significantly more powerful than the standard normalization flow approach for generating data distributions with multiple modes. Extensive experiments have shown the advantages of NF with variational latent representation.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2022.

Builds on

31 of 43 references.

References · 31

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  6. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,712
  7. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  8. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  9. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  10. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
  11. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,970
  12. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
19 more
  1. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,626
  2. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
  3. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  4. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  5. 2019Generating Diverse High-Fidelity Images with VQ-VAE-2cited by 1,387
  6. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,058
  7. 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 684
  8. 2016Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flowcited by 640
  9. 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 596
  10. 2018FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Modelscited by 594
  11. 2015Importance Weighted Autoencoderscited by 456
  12. 2019Your Classifier is Secretly an Energy Based Model and You Should Treat it Like Onecited by 405
  13. 2015MADE: Masked Autoencoder for Distribution Estimationcited by 307
  14. 2019Flow++: Improving Flow-Based Generative Models with Variational Dequantization and Architecture Designcited by 262
  15. 2019Residual Flows for Invertible Generative Modelingcited by 257
  16. 2018Neural Autoregressive Flowscited by 208
  17. 2019Sum-of-Squares Polynomial Flowcited by 62
  18. 2018Transformation Autoregressive Networkscited by 27
  19. 2020Normalizing Flows with Multi-Scale Autoregressive Priorscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.