Revealing Robust Oil and Gas Company Macro-Strategies using Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The energy transition potentially poses an existential risk for major international oil companies (IOCs) if they fail to adapt to low-carbon business models. Projections of energy futures, however, are met with diverging assumptions on its scale and pace, causing disagreement among IOC decision-makers and their stakeholders over what the business model of an incumbent fossil fuel company should be. In this work, we used deep multi-agent reinforcement learning to solve an energy systems wargame wherein players simulate IOC decision-making, including hydrocarbon and low-carbon investments decisions, dividend policies, and capital structure measures, through an uncertain energy transition to explore critical and non-linear governance questions, from leveraged transitions to reserve replacements. Adversarial play facilitated by state-of-the-art algorithms revealed decision-making strategies robust to energy transition uncertainty and against multiple IOCs. In all games, robust strategies emerged in the form of low-carbon business models as a result of early transition-oriented movement. IOCs adopting such strategies outperformed business-as-usual and delayed transition strategies regardless of hydrocarbon demand projections. In addition to maximizing value, these strategies benefit greater society by contributing substantial amounts of capital necessary to accelerate the global low-carbon energy transition. Our findings point towards the need for lenders and investors to effectively mobilize transition-oriented finance and engage with IOCs to ensure responsible reallocation of capital towards low-carbon business models that would enable the emergence of fossil fuel incumbents as future low-carbon leaders.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2022.
Builds on
5 of 80 references.
References · 5
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,103
- 2020Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?cited by 294
- 2017A Unified Game-Theoretic Approach to Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 268
- 2017Emergent Complexity via Multi-Agent Competitioncited by 120
- 2019Open-ended Learning in Symmetric Zero-sum Gamescited by 96
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via Steganographycited by 113
- 2026Exploring the Cryptographic Limits of Transformer Networkscited by 1
- 2025Optimizing Information Asset Investment Strategies in the Exploratory Phase of the Oil and Gas Industry: A Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 0
- 2026Margin Play: A Multi-Agent System For Public Policy Analysis In The Brazilian Equatorial Margincited by 0
- 2026Exploring the Cryptographic Limits of Transformer Networks28 Jun 2026
- 2026Margin Play: A Multi-Agent System For Public Policy Analysis In The Brazilian Equatorial Margin26 May 2026
- 2025Optimizing Information Asset Investment Strategies in the Exploratory Phase of the Oil and Gas Industry: A Reinforcement Learning Approach28 Nov 2025
- 2024Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via Steganography12 Feb 2024