Internal Representations of Vision Models Through the Lens of Frames on Data Manifolds
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While the last five years have seen considerable progress in understanding the internal representations of deep learning models, many questions remain. This is especially true when trying to understand the impact of model design choices, such as model architecture or training algorithm, on hidden representation geometry and dynamics. In this work we present a new approach to studying such representations inspired by the idea of a frame on the tangent bundle of a manifold. Our construction, which we call a neural frame, is formed by assembling a set of vectors representing specific types of perturbations of a data point, for example infinitesimal augmentations, noise perturbations, or perturbations produced by a generative model, and studying how these change as they pass through a network. Using neural frames, we make observations about the way that models process, layer-by-layer, specific modes of variation within a small neighborhood of a datapoint. Our results provide new perspectives on a number of phenomena, such as the manner in which training with augmentation produces model invariance or the proposed trade-off between adversarial training and model generalization.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2022.
Builds on
29 of 45 references.
References · 29
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 802
17 more
- 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 503
- 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 324
- 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 316
- 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 315
- 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 282
- 2019Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networkscited by 282
- 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 250
- 2014Understanding image representations by measuring their equivariance and equivalencecited by 243
- 2019Kornia: an Open Source Differentiable Computer Vision Library for PyTorchcited by 232
- 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 207
- 2020Topology of deep neural networkscited by 112
- 2020On Linear Identifiability of Learned Representationscited by 105
- 2018Neural Persistence: A Complexity Measure for Deep Neural Networks Using Algebraic Topologycited by 73
- 2021Representation Topology Divergence: A Method for Comparing Neural Network Representationscited by 66
- 2019Stable Rank Normalization for Improved Generalization in Neural Networks and GANscited by 41
- 2021PRIME: A few primitives can boost robustness to common corruptionscited by 40
- 2022Boomerang: Local sampling on image manifolds using diffusion modelscited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.