Just a Matter of Scale? Reevaluating Scale Equivariance in Convolutional Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The widespread success of convolutional neural networks may largely be attributed to their intrinsic property of translation equivariance. However, convolutions are not equivariant to variations in scale and fail to generalize to objects of different sizes. Despite recent advances in this field, it remains unclear how well current methods generalize to unobserved scales on real-world data and to what extent scale equivariance plays a role. To address this, we propose the novel Scaled and Translated Image Recognition (STIR) benchmark based on four different domains. Additionally, we introduce a new family of models that applies many re-scaled kernels with shared weights in parallel and then selects the most appropriate one. Our experimental results on STIR show that both the existing and proposed approaches can improve generalization across scales compared to standard convolutions. We also demonstrate that our family of models is able to generalize well towards larger scales and improve scale equivariance. Moreover, due to their unique design we can validate that kernel selection is consistent with input scale. Even so, none of the evaluated models maintain their performance for large differences in scale, demonstrating that a general understanding of how scale equivariance can improve generalization and robustness is still lacking.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2022.
Builds on
27 of 40 references.
References · 27
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,446
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2015Spatial Transformer Networkscited by 1,429
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2016Group Equivariant Convolutional Networkscited by 1,165
- 2017DOTA: A Large-scale Dataset for Object Detection in Aerial Imagescited by 623
- 2015Attention to Scale: Scale-aware Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 169
- 2020On Translation Invariance in CNNs: Convolutional Layers can Exploit Absolute Spatial Locationcited by 142
- 2019Deep Scale-spaces: Equivariance Over Scalecited by 114
15 more
- 2019Scale-Equivariant Steerable Networkscited by 110
- 2016A Unified Multi-scale Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Fast Object Detectioncited by 83
- 2016CrowdNet: A Deep Convolutional Network for Dense Crowd Countingcited by 52
- 2019The Mapillary Traffic Sign Dataset for Detection and Classification on a Global Scalecited by 50
- 2014Scale-Invariant Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 40
- 2021DISCO: accurate Discrete Scale Convolutionscited by 36
- 2014Locally Scale-Invariant Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 34
- 2019Scale Steerable Filters for Locally Scale-Invariant Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 22
- 2016Learning scale-variant and scale-invariant features for deep image classificationcited by 20
- 2018Scale equivariance in CNNs with vector fieldscited by 20
- 2019Scaling-Translation-Equivariant Networks with Decomposed Convolutional Filterscited by 18
- 2021Scale-invariant scale-channel networks: Deep networks that generalise to previously unseen scalescited by 17
- 2020Exploring the ability of CNNs to generalise to previously unseen scales over wide scale rangescited by 10
- 2021Stride and Translation Invariance in CNNscited by 7
- 2020Understanding when spatial transformer networks do not support invariance, and what to do about itcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.