mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Connection of Generative Models and Discriminative Models for Anomaly Detection

arXiv 2211.08910 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2022cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Anomaly detection (AD) has attracted considerable attention in both academia and industry. Due to the lack of anomalous data in many practical cases, AD is usually solved by first modeling the normal data pattern and then determining if data fit this model. Generative models (GMs) seem a natural tool to achieve this purpose, which learn the normal data distribution and estimate it using a probability density function (PDF). However, some works have observed the ideal performance of such GM-based AD methods. In this paper, we propose a new perspective on the ideal performance of GM-based AD methods. We state that in these methods, the implicit assumption that connects GMs'results to AD's goal is usually implausible due to normal data's multi-peaked distribution characteristic, which is quite common in practical cases. We first qualitatively formulate this perspective, and then focus on the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) to intuitively illustrate the perspective, which is a typical GM and has the natural property to approximate multi-peaked distributions. Based on the proposed perspective, in order to bypass the implicit assumption in the GMM-based AD method, we suggest integrating the Discriminative idea to orient GMM to AD tasks (DiGMM). With DiGMM, we establish a connection of generative and discriminative models, which are two key paradigms for AD and are usually treated separately before. This connection provides a possible direction for future works to jointly consider the two paradigms and incorporate their complementary characteristics for AD.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2022.

Builds on

11 of 29 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  2. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,052
  3. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
  4. 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
  5. 2020Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 220
  6. 2018Generative Probabilistic Novelty Detection with Adversarial Autoencoderscited by 99
  7. 2021Understanding Failures in Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Generative Modelscited by 89
  8. 2020Perfect density models cannot guarantee anomaly detectioncited by 39
  9. 2020Further Analysis of Outlier Detection with Deep Generative Modelscited by 31
  10. 2019Detecting Out-of-Distribution Inputs to Deep Generative Models Using Typicalitycited by 30
  11. 2016A Discriminative Framework for Anomaly Detection in Large Videoscited by 25

Built on by

Not cited yet.