mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Is the Machine Smarter than the Theorist: Deriving Formulas for Particle Kinematics with Symbolic Regression

arXiv 2211.08420 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2022hep-ph cs.AI cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We demonstrate the use of symbolic regression in deriving analytical formulas, which are needed at various stages of a typical experimental analysis in collider phenomenology. As a first application, we consider kinematic variables like the stransverse mass, MT2, which are defined algorithmically through an optimization procedure and not in terms of an analytical formula. We then train a symbolic regression and obtain the correct analytical expressions for all known special cases of MT2 in the literature. As a second application, we reproduce the correct analytical expression for a next-to-leading order (NLO) kinematic distribution from data, which is simulated with a NLO event generator. Finally, we derive analytical approximations for the NLO kinematic distributions after detector simulation, for which no known analytical formulas currently exist.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2022.

Builds on

18 of 68 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  2. 2016Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physicscited by 503
  3. 2020Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive Biasescited by 335
  4. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 195
  5. 2016A Compositional Object-Based Approach to Learning Physical Dynamicscited by 119
  6. 2018Discovering physical concepts with neural networkscited by 117
  7. 2022Rediscovering orbital mechanics with machine learningcited by 71
  8. 2020A Bayesian machine scientist to aid in the solution of challenging scientific problemscited by 61
  9. 2022Deep Symbolic Regression for Recurrent Sequencescited by 53
  10. 2019Learning Symbolic Physics with Graph Networkscited by 52
  11. 2022Rethinking Symbolic Regression Datasets and Benchmarks for Scientific Discoverycited by 44
  12. 2022AI Poincar'e 2.0: Machine Learning Conservation Laws from Differential Equationscited by 20
6 more
  1. 2021Analytical Modelling of Exoplanet Transit Specroscopy with Dimensional Analysis and Symbolic Regressioncited by 18
  2. 2022Simplifying Polylogarithms with Machine Learningcited by 14
  3. 2022Fundamental limits to learning closed-form mathematical models from datacited by 12
  4. 2022SYMBA: Symbolic Computation of Squared Amplitudes in High Energy Physics with Machine Learningcited by 12
  5. 2021Accelerating Understanding of Scientific Experiments with End to End Symbolic Regressioncited by 8
  6. 2022Symbolic Expression Transformer: A Computer Vision Approach for Symbolic Regressioncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

8 papers.