Automatic Evaluation of Excavator Operators using Learned Reward Functions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training novice users to operate an excavator for learning different skills requires the presence of expert teachers. Considering the complexity of the problem, it is comparatively expensive to find skilled experts as the process is time-consuming and requires precise focus. Moreover, since humans tend to be biased, the evaluation process is noisy and will lead to high variance in the final score of different operators with similar skills. In this work, we address these issues and propose a novel strategy for the automatic evaluation of excavator operators. We take into account the internal dynamics of the excavator and the safety criterion at every time step to evaluate the performance. To further validate our approach, we use this score prediction model as a source of reward for a reinforcement learning agent to learn the task of maneuvering an excavator in a simulated environment that closely replicates the real-world dynamics. For a policy learned using these external reward prediction models, our results demonstrate safer solutions following the required dynamic constraints when compared to policy trained with task-based reward functions only, making it one step closer to real-life adoption. For future research, we release our codebase at https://github.com/pranavAL/InvRL_Auto-Evaluate and video results https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jR1otOAu8zrY8mkhUOUZW9jkBOAKK71Z/view?usp=share_link .
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2022.
Builds on
23 of 40 references.
References · 23
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
- 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
- 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
- 2018Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulationcited by 643
- 2018Visual Reinforcement Learning with Imagined Goalscited by 248
- 2018Learning by Playing - Solving Sparse Reward Tasks from Scratchcited by 164
- 2021A System for General In-Hand Object Re-Orientationcited by 155
- 2019Planning with Goal-Conditioned Policiescited by 144
- 2018State Representation Learning for Control: An Overviewcited by 125
- 2020Learning to Utilize Shaping Rewards: A New Approach of Reward Shapingcited by 112
- 2019Making Sense of Vision and Touch: Learning Multimodal Representations for Contact-Rich Taskscited by 80
11 more
- 2022Reinforcement Learning with Sparse Rewards using Guidance from Offline Demonstrationcited by 54
- 2020Probabilistic Future Prediction for Video Scene Understandingcited by 45
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning for the Control of Robotic Manipulation: A Focussed Mini-Reviewcited by 34
- 2019Driving with Style: Inverse Reinforcement Learning in General-Purpose Planning for Automated Drivingcited by 30
- 2020PlanGAN: Model-based Planning With Sparse Rewards and Multiple Goalscited by 21
- 2021Learning Temporal Dynamics from Cycles in Narrated Videocited by 13
- 2020Robust Reinforcement Learning-based Autonomous Driving Agent for Simulation and Real Worldcited by 12
- 2020Learning Sparse Rewarded Tasks from Sub-Optimal Demonstrationscited by 7
- 2020Balance Between Efficient and Effective Learning: Dense2Sparse Reward Shaping for Robot Manipulation with Environment Uncertaintycited by 3
- 2021Reinforcement Learning Control of a Forestry Crane Manipulatorcited by 3
- 2021Goal-constrained Sparse Reinforcement Learning for End-to-End Drivingcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.