mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Does Debiasing Inevitably Degrade the Model Performance

arXiv 2211.07350 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2022cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Gender bias in language models has attracted sufficient attention because it threatens social justice. However, most of the current debiasing methods degraded the model's performance on other tasks while the degradation mechanism is still mysterious. We propose a theoretical framework explaining the three candidate mechanisms of the language model's gender bias. We use our theoretical framework to explain why the current debiasing methods cause performance degradation. We also discover a pathway through which debiasing will not degrade the model performance. We further develop a causality-detection fine-tuning approach to correct gender bias. The numerical experiment demonstrates that our method is able to lead to double dividends: partially mitigating gender bias while avoiding performance degradation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2022.

Builds on

24 of 31 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  2. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  3. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  4. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  5. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
  6. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
  7. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
  8. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  9. 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 455
  10. 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 398
  11. 2013Direct and Indirect Effectscited by 280
  12. 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
12 more
  1. 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 249
  2. 2019Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Modelscited by 214
  3. 2020Towards Debiasing Sentence Representationscited by 171
  4. 2018Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddingscited by 169
  5. 2021RedditBias: A Real-World Resource for Bias Evaluation and Debiasing of Conversational Language Modelscited by 149
  6. 2021An Empirical Survey of the Effectiveness of Debiasing Techniques for Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 97
  7. 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
  8. 2019Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Models with a Gender-Equalizing Loss Functioncited by 57
  9. 2020Investigating Gender Bias in BERTcited by 40
  10. 2019A General Framework for Implicit and Explicit Debiasing of Distributional Word Vector Spacescited by 36
  11. 2019A Causal Inference Method for Reducing Gender Bias in Word Embedding Relationscited by 11
  12. 2020Neutralizing Gender Bias in Word Embedding with Latent Disentanglement and Counterfactual Generationcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.