Neutralizing Gender Bias in Word Embedding with Latent Disentanglement and Counterfactual Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent research demonstrates that word embeddings, trained on the human-generated corpus, have strong gender biases in embedding spaces, and these biases can result in the discriminative results from the various downstream tasks. Whereas the previous methods project word embeddings into a linear subspace for debiasing, we introduce a textitLatent Disentanglement method with a siamese auto-encoder structure with an adapted gradient reversal layer. Our structure enables the separation of the semantic latent information and gender latent information of given word into the disjoint latent dimensions. Afterwards, we introduce a textitCounterfactual Generation to convert the gender information of words, so the original and the modified embeddings can produce a gender-neutralized word embedding after geometric alignment regularization, without loss of semantic information. From the various quantitative and qualitative debiasing experiments, our method shows to be better than existing debiasing methods in debiasing word embeddings. In addition, Our method shows the ability to preserve semantic information during debiasing by minimizing the semantic information losses for extrinsic NLP downstream tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 3.
10 papers.
- 2021Quantifying Social Biases in NLP: A Generalization and Empirical Comparison of Extrinsic Fairness Metricscited by 83
- 2022Theories of "Gender" in NLP Bias Researchcited by 62
- 2021Counterfactual Interventions Reveal the Causal Effect of Relative Clause Representations on Agreement Predictioncited by 58
- 2022Choose Your Lenses: Flaws in Gender Bias Evaluationcited by 29
- 2021Style Pooling: Automatic Text Style Obfuscation for Improved Classification Fairnesscited by 12
- 2021Word Embeddings via Causal Inference: Gender Bias Reducing and Semantic Information Preservingcited by 11
- 2024Measuring Machine Learning Harms from Stereotypes Requires Understanding Who Is Harmed by Which Errors in What Wayscited by 4
- 2022Does Debiasing Inevitably Degrade the Model Performancecited by 2
- 2024Detecting Bias in Large Language Models: Fine-tuned KcBERTcited by 2
- 2024A Note on Bias to Completecited by 1
- 2024Detecting Bias in Large Language Models: Fine-tuned KcBERT16 Mar 2024
- 2024A Note on Bias to Complete18 Feb 2024
- 2024Measuring Machine Learning Harms from Stereotypes Requires Understanding Who Is Harmed by Which Errors in What Ways6 Feb 2024
- 2022Does Debiasing Inevitably Degrade the Model Performance14 Nov 2022
- 2022Choose Your Lenses: Flaws in Gender Bias Evaluation20 Oct 2022
- 2022Theories of "Gender" in NLP Bias Research5 May 2022
- 2021Word Embeddings via Causal Inference: Gender Bias Reducing and Semantic Information Preserving9 Dec 2021
- 2021Style Pooling: Automatic Text Style Obfuscation for Improved Classification Fairness10 Sep 2021
- 2021Quantifying Social Biases in NLP: A Generalization and Empirical Comparison of Extrinsic Fairness Metrics28 Jun 2021
- 2021Counterfactual Interventions Reveal the Causal Effect of Relative Clause Representations on Agreement Prediction14 May 2021