RISE: Robust Individualized Decision Learning with Sensitive Variables
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces RISE, a robust individualized decision learning framework with sensitive variables, where sensitive variables are collectible data and important to the intervention decision, but their inclusion in decision making is prohibited due to reasons such as delayed availability or fairness concerns. A naive baseline is to ignore these sensitive variables in learning decision rules, leading to significant uncertainty and bias. To address this, we propose a decision learning framework to incorporate sensitive variables during offline training but not include them in the input of the learned decision rule during model deployment. Specifically, from a causal perspective, the proposed framework intends to improve the worst-case outcomes of individuals caused by sensitive variables that are unavailable at the time of decision. Unlike most existing literature that uses mean-optimal objectives, we propose a robust learning framework by finding a newly defined quantile- or infimum-optimal decision rule. The reliable performance of the proposed method is demonstrated through synthetic experiments and three real-world applications.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2022.
Builds on
24 of 82 references.
References · 24
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 597
- 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 475
- 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
- 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
- 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
- 2017Fair Inference On Outcomescited by 143
12 more
- 2019Achieving Fairness in the Stochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problemcited by 77
- 2018A Contextual Bandit Bake-offcited by 64
- 2021Causally motivated Shortcut Removal Using Auxiliary Labelscited by 55
- 2018Learning Optimal Fair Policiescited by 49
- 2016Engineering Safety in Machine Learningcited by 24
- 2016Bounded, efficient and multiply robust estimation of average treatment effects using instrumental variablescited by 23
- 2021Proximal Learning for Individualized Treatment Regimes Under Unmeasured Confoundingcited by 21
- 2021A Tree-based Model Averaging Approach for Personalized Treatment Effect Estimation from Heterogeneous Data Sourcescited by 14
- 2019On Robustness of Individualized Decision Rulescited by 6
- 2022On Learning and Testing of Counterfactual Fairness through Data Preprocessingcited by 6
- 2019Estimation of Individualized Decision Rules Based on an Optimized Covariate-Dependent Equivalent of Random Outcomescited by 3
- 2021Identifying Principal Stratum Causal Effects Conditional on a Post-treatment Intermediate Responsecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
3 papers.