HilMeMe: A Human-in-the-Loop Machine Translation Evaluation Metric Looking into Multi-Word Expressions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the fast development of Machine Translation (MT) systems, especially the new boost from Neural MT (NMT) models, the MT output quality has reached a new level of accuracy. However, many researchers criticised that the current popular evaluation metrics such as BLEU can not correctly distinguish the state-of-the-art NMT systems regarding quality differences. In this short paper, we describe the design and implementation of a linguistically motivated human-in-the-loop evaluation metric looking into idiomatic and terminological Multi-word Expressions (MWEs). MWEs have played a bottleneck in many Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks including MT. MWEs can be used as one of the main factors to distinguish different MT systems by looking into their capabilities in recognising and translating MWEs in an accurate and meaning equivalent manner.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2022.
Builds on
6 of 28 references.
References · 6
- 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 333
- 2020A Set of Recommendations for Assessing Human-Machine Parity in Language Translationcited by 34
- 2021Translation Quality Assessment: A Brief Survey on Manual and Automatic Methodscited by 23
- 2021HOPE: A Task-Oriented and Human-Centric Evaluation Framework Using Professional Post-Editing Towards More Effective MT Evaluationcited by 17
- 2021Chinese Character Decomposition for Neural MT with Multi-Word Expressionscited by 11
- 2016Word2Vec vs DBnary: Augmenting METEOR using Vector Representations or Lexical Resources?cited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.