mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Efficacy of MRI data harmonization in the age of machine learning. A multicenter study across 36 datasets

arXiv 2211.04125 ↗First posted 8 Nov 2022cs.LG eess.IV q-bio.QMcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pooling publicly-available MRI data from multiple sites allows to assemble extensive groups of subjects, increase statistical power, and promote data reuse with machine learning techniques. The harmonization of multicenter data is necessary to reduce the confounding effect associated with non-biological sources of variability in the data. However, when applied to the entire dataset before machine learning, the harmonization leads to data leakage, because information outside the training set may affect model building, and potentially falsely overestimate performance. We propose a 1) measurement of the efficacy of data harmonization; 2) harmonizer transformer, i.e., an implementation of the ComBat harmonization allowing its encapsulation among the preprocessing steps of a machine learning pipeline, avoiding data leakage. We tested these tools using brain T1-weighted MRI data from 1740 healthy subjects acquired at 36 sites. After harmonization, the site effect was removed or reduced, and we showed the data leakage effect in predicting individual age from MRI data, highlighting that introducing the harmonizer transformer into a machine learning pipeline allows for avoiding data leakage.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 113 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2022.

Builds on

3 of 113 references.

References · 3

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,143
  2. 2020Detect and Correct Bias in Multi-Site Neuroimaging Datasetscited by 44
  3. 2022Inflation of test accuracy due to data leakage in deep learning-based classification of OCT imagescited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

5 papers.