ComBAT Harmonization for diffusion MRI: Challenges and Best Practices
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Over the years, ComBAT has become the standard method for harmonizing MRI-derived measurements, with its ability to compensate for site-related additive and multiplicative biases while preserving biological variability. However, ComBAT relies on a set of assumptions that, when violated, can result in flawed harmonization. In this paper, we thoroughly review ComBAT's mathematical foundation, outlining these assumptions, and exploring their implications for the demographic composition necessary for optimal results. Through a series of experiments involving a slightly modified version of ComBAT called Pairwise-ComBAT tailored for normative modeling applications, we assess the impact of various population characteristics, including population size, age distribution, the absence of certain covariates, and the magnitude of additive and multiplicative factors. Based on these experiments, we present five essential recommendations that should be carefully considered to enhance consistency and supporting reproducibility, two essential factors for open science, collaborative research, and real-life clinical deployment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.
Builds on
3 of 46 references.
References · 3
- 2019Scanner Invariant Representations for Diffusion MRI Harmonizationcited by 27
- 2022Efficacy of MRI data harmonization in the age of machine learning. A multicenter study across 36 datasetscited by 6
- 2024Distributed Harmonization: Federated Clustered Batch Effect Adjustment and Generalizationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.