mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Inflation of test accuracy due to data leakage in deep learning-based classification of OCT images

arXiv 2202.12267 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2022eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the application of deep learning on optical coherence tomography (OCT) data, it is common to train classification networks using 2D images originating from volumetric data. Given the micrometer resolution of OCT systems, consecutive images are often very similar in both visible structures and noise. Thus, an inappropriate data split can result in overlap between the training and testing sets, with a large portion of the literature overlooking this aspect. In this study, the effect of improper dataset splitting on model evaluation is demonstrated for three classification tasks using three OCT open-access datasets extensively used, Kermany's and Srinivasan's ophthalmology datasets, and AIIMS breast tissue dataset. Results show that the classification performance is inflated by 0.07 up to 0.43 in terms of Matthews Correlation Coefficient (accuracy: 5% to 30%) for models tested on datasets with improper splitting, highlighting the considerable effect of dataset handling on model evaluation. This study intends to raise awareness on the importance of dataset splitting given the increased research interest in implementing deep learning on OCT data.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2022.

Builds on

4 of 46 references.

References · 4

  1. 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
  2. 2017Medical Image Analysis using Convolutional Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 99
  3. 2018Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with carecited by 90
  4. 2019Optic-Net: A Novel Convolutional Neural Network for Diagnosis of Retinal Diseases from Optical Tomography Imagescited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 8.

17 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Localization Is All You Evaluate: Data Leakage in Online Mapping Datasets and How to Fix Itcited by 44
  2. 2023Coarse race data conceals disparities in clinical risk score performancecited by 15
  3. 2022AutoPrognosis 2.0: Democratizing Diagnostic and Prognostic Modeling in Healthcare with Automated Machine Learningcited by 10
  4. 2024Investigating the Quality of DermaMNIST and Fitzpatrick17k Dermatological Image Datasetscited by 7
  5. 2022Efficacy of MRI data harmonization in the age of machine learning. A multicenter study across 36 datasetscited by 5
  6. 2024SpanSeq: Similarity-based sequence data splitting method for improved development and assessment of deep learning projectscited by 5
  7. 2025Integration of nested cross-validation, automated hyperparameter optimization, high-performance computing to reduce and quantify the variance of test performance estimation of deep learning modelscited by 1
  8. 2025Advanced Multi-Architecture Deep Learning Framework for BIRADS-Based Mammographic Image Retrieval: Comprehensive Performance Analysis with Super-Ensemble Optimizationcited by 0
  9. 2025A geometric and deep learning reproducible pipeline for monitoring floating anthropogenic debris in urban rivers using in situ camerascited by 0
  10. 2026Beyond Perfect Scores: Proof-by-Contradiction for Trustworthy Machine Learningcited by 0
  11. 2026Early Linguistic Pattern of Anxiety from Social Media Using Interpretable Linguistic Features: A Multi-Faceted Validation Study with Author-Disjoint Evaluationcited by 0
  12. 2026On Procrustes Contamination in Machine Learning Applications of Geometric Morphometricscited by 0
5 more
  1. 2026fastml: Guarded Resampling Workflows for Safer Automated Machine Learning in Rcited by 0
  2. 2026Certification of Machine Learning Models via Directional Sharpnesscited by 0
  3. 2026Do ECG Foundation Models Transfer to Rare Cardiac Diseases? Evidence from Brugada Syndrome Detectioncited by 0
  4. 2026Monte Carlo Dropout Uncertainty and Entropy-Thresholded Selective Prediction for Architecture-Agnostic Brain Tumor MRI Triagecited by 0
  5. 2026Patient-Level, Leakage-Aware Deep Learning for Cross-Center Periapical Radiograph Classificationcited by 0